High-Temperature Catalytic Platform Powered by Thermophilic Microorganisms and Thermozymes

Review Open Access

High-Temperature Catalytic Platform Powered by Thermophilic Microorganisms and Thermozymes

Author Information
1
Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, Aerospace Center Hospital, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
Tangshan Research Institute, Beijing Institute of Technology, Tangshan 063000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Views:209
Downloads:46
Synthetic Biology and Engineering 2025, 3 (1), 10001;  https://doi.org/10.70322/sbe.2025.10001

Received: 15 December 2024 Accepted: 06 February 2025 Published: 13 February 2025

Creative Commons

© 2025 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

ABSTRACT: Thermophilic microorganisms, capable of thriving under high temperatures, are emerging as key platforms for next-generation industrial biotechnology (NGIB), driving innovations in lignin biorefining, bioplastics synthesis, biodiesel production, and environmental remediation. Enzymes derived from thermophilic microorganisms, thermozymes, exhibit remarkable stability and efficiency under extreme conditions, making them highly suitable for diverse industrial applications. This review highlights recent advances in leveraging thermophilic microorganisms and thermozymes for high-temperature catalysis, focusing on their economic and environmental benefits. It also emphasizes progress in high-throughput screening and artificial intelligence (AI), which have revolutionized the bioprospecting, engineering, and application potential of thermozymes. Challenges and potential solutions for industrial implementation of high-temperature catalytic platforms are also discussed, highlighting their transformative impact on sustainable biotechnology.
Keywords: Thermophiles; Thermozymes; NGIB; Synthetic biology; Machine learning; High-throughput screening

1. Introduction

The reliance on fossil resources has led to substantial greenhouse gas emissions and hazardous waste, causing serious environmental impacts [1]. Biomanufacturing utilizing microbial chassis and biomass feedstocks offers a sustainable alternative that reduces environmental burdens, provides eco-friendly chemicals and materials, and decreases reliance on fossil resources, thereby promoting carbon neutrality and sustainability [2,3]. Despite these advantages, current industrial biotechnology (CIB) still faces numerous challenges in chemical production, such as complex sterilization, fermentation, and purification processes, as well as low microbial conversion rates, all of which limit its economic viability [4]. To address these issues, next-generation industrial biotechnology (NGIB) has emerged, emphasizing the use of contamination-resistant microbes under open, continuous conditions to reduce energy consumption and enable automated, sustainable production [4,5]. Traditional model microbial chassis, such as Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Bacillus subtilis, and some yeasts, typically operate within the mesophilic temperature range (25–37 °C) and face challenges such as contamination risk, complex sterilization requirements, and high freshwater consumption, which hinder the scalability [4]. In contrast, fermentation at temperatures above 45 °C significantly reduces contamination risk by suppressing the growth of most mesophiles [6,7]. Thermophilic microorganisms offer new opportunities for NGIB by enabling open, controllable fermentation scenarios and have the potential to overcome the limitations faced by traditional industrial biotechnological platforms [8,9]. Thermophilic microorganisms survive in high-temperature environments due to the exceptional thermal stability of their enzymes. These thermozymes exhibit remarkable resistance to high temperatures and, in addition, they meet the stringent performance requirements in industrial processing [10]. Their ability to significantly accelerate chemical reactions reduces energy consumption, thereby achieving cost savings and efficiency improvements. These characteristics endow thermozymes with unique advantages in various fields, including bioconversion, environmental protection, and food processing [11,12]. With the advancement of machine learning technologies, the bioprospecting of more robust thermozymes, as well as research aimed at enhancing enzyme thermal stability, has significantly accelerated the progress of enzyme engineering, providing strong support for the development of industrial biotechnology [13]. To date, numerous studies have reported the use of thermophilic microorganisms and enzymes as high-temperature catalytic platforms. In this review, we summarize recent research advances in this field and discuss current challenges that need to be addressed.

2. High-Temperature Catalytic Platforms

Thermophiles refer to a group of microorganisms with an optimal growth temperature (TOPT) exceeding 45 °C [14]. These organisms are widely distributed in high-temperature habitats on earth, including hot springs and hydrothermal vents, holding significant research value in fields such as biogeochemical cycles, microbial diversity, and microbial evolution [15]. Additionally, high-temperature environments such as composting piles and industrial wastewater treatment systems also serve as habitats for thermophilic microorganisms (Figure 1). Based on the growth temperature ranges, thermophiles are further classified into several groups. Microorganisms that thrive at temperatures between 45 °C and 70 °C are termed moderate thermophiles, while those that survive at temperatures from 70 °C to 80 °C are classified as extreme thermophiles. Organisms that flourish at temperatures above 80 °C are referred to as hyperthermophiles [8,16]. Notably, reports indicate that certain hyperthermophiles, such as Methanopyrus kandleri, can survive at extreme temperatures ranging from 116 °C to 122 °C [17].
Figure 1. Growth temperature range and representative species of thermophilic microorganisms.
Thermophilic microorganisms demonstrate extensive potential for application across multiple industrial sectors, with a growing demand driven by technological advancements. For instance, certain thermophilic strains are capable of withstanding chemical denaturants and maintaining activity across a broad pH range, thereby enabling efficient production of biofuels such as ethanol and isobutanol under high-temperature conditions [18]. Additionally, thermophiles are a significant source of a variety of thermally stable enzymes with high industrial value. These enzymes include but are not limited to, amylases, cellulases, xylanases, lipases, and DNA polymerases, whose stability in elevated temperatures provides unique advantages for industrial applications [19]. 2.1. Design Principles of High-Temperature Catalytic Platforms To fully leverage the potential of thermophilic microorganisms and enzymes as catalysts, designing and optimizing high-temperature catalytic platforms requires consideration of catalyst types, reaction conditions, and catalyst combinations. Application scenarios are the primary consideration when selecting appropriate thermophilic catalysts. The primary reactions involved in high-temperature catalysis include hydrolysis, esterification, hydrogenation, and redox reactions, each suited to specific applications. For instance, hydrolysis breaks down complex polymers like starch, proteins, and cellulose, while esterification is central to lipid and biodiesel production [11,20,21,22]. Hydrogenation plays a role in hydrogen fermentation, and redox reactions are widely used in processes such as lignin degradation, wastewater treatment, metal bioleaching, cosmetic production, and methane oxidation [23,24,25,26,27].Optimizing reaction conditions such as temperature, pH, reactant concentration, and catalyst concentration for different catalysts or catalytic reactions helps maximize their advantages and improve catalytic efficiency. Tailoring substrates based on microbial metabolic characteristics is also essential. For instance, Clostridium thermocellum excels in lignin conversion, while Bacillus licheniformis effectively metabolizes inulin and other non-sugar biomasses [28,29]. In specialized catalytic platforms, factors like nutrient limitation and light intensity enhance lipid accumulation in thermophilic algae, while hydrogenation reactions require careful consideration of reactor design, operational conditions, and safety precautions [30,31,32]. Directly using thermophilic enzymes can be quite expensive due to their high cost, but the immobilized enzyme strategy helps mitigate this issue, as it is suitable for continuous production [33]. For applications involving cascade reactions, combining microorganisms and thermozymes is an efficient strategy to create highly effective biocatalytic platforms. For example, expressing highly active thermophilic enzymes in non-thermophilic bacteria to develop high-temperature whole-cell catalytic platforms reduces side reactions, streamlines metabolism, and improves the selectivity of thermozymes catalysis [34]. 2.2. Thermophilic Microorganisms Serving as NGIB Platform In the fermentation industry, high-temperature catalytic systems demonstrate significant energy-saving advantages, particularly in reducing cooling energy requirements and the risk of contamination, which is of great importance for industrial energy conservation and emission reduction [35]. In recent years, one of the key research focuses in biotechnology has been the isolation and metabolic engineering of thermophilic microorganisms, which exhibit optimal growth performance at moderate to high temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 80 °C (Table 1). The application of thermophilic microorganisms as high-temperature catalysis platforms is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Industrial applications of thermophilic microorganisms.
Thermophilic Bacillus B. licheniformis, as an efficient and safe high-temperature fermentation platform strain, grows rapidly at 50 °C. Its strong resistance to chemical denaturants and broad pH adaptability enable the effective production of biofuels, such as D-lactic acid and 2,3-butanediol, in high-temperature environments. Han et al. engineered B. licheniformis to activate dormant pathways for the production of L-alanine at 50 °C, achieving a high yield of optically pure L-alanine (93.7 g/L) [36]. Ge et al. identified stereospecific dehydrogenases in B. licheniformis MW3 responsible for the synthesis of 2,3-BDO. They achieved final concentrations of 123.7 g/L for (2R,3R)-2,3-BDO with a productivity of 2.95 g/L/h and 90.1 g/L for meso-2,3-BDO with a productivity of 2.82 g/L/h, both at 50 °C [37]. By further deleting associated genes, the strain was also able to produce 64.2 g/L of acetoin at 50 °C [38]. B. licheniformis MW3 can also convert low-cost biomass such as Jerusalem artichoke into meso-BDO, improving efficiency and reducing costs [29]. Additionally, it can ferment diverse feedstocks, including corn stover and food waste, supporting scalable, eco-friendly biomanufacturing [39,40]. Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius (formerly known as Parageobacillus thermoglucosidus), with optimal growth at 60 °C, is ideal for high-temperature bioproduction. Through metabolic engineering, modified strains produced high levels of L-lactic acid (151.1 g/L) and D-lactic acid (153.1 g/L) at 60 °C with conversion rates of 98.7% and 93.0% [41]. Additionally, by deleting ccpN, a transcriptional regulator that redirects glucose metabolism from glycolysis to the pentose phosphate pathway, along with the lactate dehydrogenase genes, the strain produced riboflavin at 1034.5 mg/L within 12 h, underscoring its versatility for high-temperature bio-based chemical production [42]. A biphasic one-pot biosynthesis system using Bacillus coagulans and a water/dioctyl phthalate biphasic setup reduced the toxicity of furfural and furfuryl alcohol, achieving a 98% furfural conversion rate and 88% selectivity for furfuryl alcohol within 6 h. This process simultaneously converted glucose to L-lactic acid, producing 264 mM furfuryl alcohol and 64.2 g/L L-lactic acid at 50 °C [43]. By establishing a reductive TCA pathway and optimizing pyc expression through promoter screening, biomass was increased, and malic acid production was enhanced to 25.5 g/L, with a glucose conversion rate of 0.3 g/g in biphasic fed-batch fermentation [44]. Using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and adaptive evolution, a high-performance Lactobacillus paracasei strain was developed, capable of efficiently producing L-lactic acid at 45 °C. In high-glucose open fermentation, it achieved a titer of 221.0 g/L and a productivity of 7.5 g/L/h [45]. Thermophilic Anaerobic bacteria Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27 has emerged as an efficient host for ethanol production, optimized through genetic modifications that enhance its lignocellulose conversion capabilities [46,47]. Knocking out specific redox-related genes to increase intracellular NAD(P)H concentrations and overexpressing the BCD complex to restore growth balance facilitated efficient ethanol production. Fermentation experiments revealed an ethanol production rate of 0.45–0.51 g/L/h and yields ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 g/g sugars at 55 °C [48]. By introducing sucrose utilization genes and additional genetic modifications, T. aotearoense SCUT27 demonstrated enhanced growth and metabolic rates using sucrose as a carbon source, improved stress tolerance. It achieved approximately 34 g/L of ethanol in sugarcane molasses. The strain also produced 3.22 g/L of butanol at 55 °C by incorporating genes related to butanol metabolism [49]. Genetic modifications further enabled SCUT27 to simultaneously metabolize glucose and cellobiose, optimizing its versatility for bioconversion processes [50,51].

Clostridium thermocellum is a strictly anaerobic thermophilic bacterium that thrives at temperatures between 45 °C and 65 °C, renowned for its efficient cellulose degradation capabilities and considered a promising host for consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) [52]. Optimization of the isobutanol pathway in this strain yielded 5.4 g/L from 80 g/L cellulose at 50 °C [53]. Through a combination of enzyme and protein engineering, C. thermocellum efficiently produced n-butanol from cellulose, with a yield of 357 mg/L at 55 °C [54]. Expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase allowed the biosynthesis of medium-chain fatty acid esters, with total yields of 200 mg/L for various short-chain esters [55]. However, it cannot metabolize xylose naturally, limiting sugar utilization. Introducing xylose metabolism genes from Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus into C. thermocellum DSM1313 doubled ethanol production efficiency [56].

Thermophilic fungi Myceliophthora thermophila is a thermophilic filamentous fungus known for its rapid cellulose degradation and significant cellulase production, allowing it to effectively break down polysaccharides in plant biomass [57]. M. thermophila does not exhibit carbon catabolite repression when utilizing cellulose, enabling it to directly transport cellooligosaccharides and xylobiose into the cell. This avoids glucose accumulation, thereby reducing interference with pentose utilization [58,59]. To reduce production costs and improve cellulose utilization, researchers overexpressed pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase. They modified the bifunctional enzyme PFK-2/FBPase-2 to eliminate FBPase-6 activity, enhancing fructose-2,6-bisphosphate supply and glycolytic rates, which significantly boosted ethanol yield. The optimized strain could directly utilize microcrystalline cellulose and corn husks at 45 °C, producing 52.8 g/L and 39.8 g/L of ethanol, respectively [60]. Beyond ethanol, M. thermophila has shown potential in the production of other high-value biochemicals. Gu et al. introduced the fumarase gene from Candida krusei into M. thermophila, deleted fumaric acid degradation pathways, and increased the supply of the precursor malic acid. These modifications enabled the engineered strain to produce 17 g/L of fumaric acid from glucose [61]. The Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, in collaboration with Anhui BBCA Group, successfully developed a technology for malic acid production from starch-based sugars. This industrial-scale production line, with a capacity of tens of thousands of tons annually, is now operational. The technology builds on research where M. thermophila produced malic acid from crystalline cellulose and corn stover at 45 °C, achieving titers of 181 g/L and 105 g/L, respectively [62]. Thermophilic methylotrophic bacteria One-carbon compounds, including CO2, methanol, methane, and formic acid, are abundant and cost-effective carbon sources with significant biological utility. They can be effectively converted by methylotrophic microorganisms, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving efficient resource utilization and environmental sustainability [63]. Bacillus methanolicus is a Gram-positive facultative methylotrophic bacterium capable of growing within a temperature range of 35 °C to 60 °C, with an optimal growth temperature of 50 °C to 55 °C [64]. By optimizing the expression of pyruvate carboxylase and homoserine dehydrogenase, B. methanolicus MGA3 can synthesize 69 g/L of L-glutamate and 11 g/L of L-lysine during fed-batch fermentation at 50 °C using methanol as the substrate. Through classical mutagenesis and screening of L-lysine analogs, the mutant strain achieved an L-lysine yield of 65 g/L [65]. Additionally, B. methanolicus naturally produces small amounts of riboflavin. Researchers enhanced riboflavin production by overexpressing the riboflavin biosynthesis pathway, achieving a riboflavin titer of approximately 523 mg/L during batch fermentation at 50 °C [66].

Table 1. Progress in the high temperature metabolic engineering of moderate thermophiles.

Host Temperature Carbon Source Product Titer/Yield Reference
Bacillus licheniformis 50 °C Glucose L-alanine 93.7 g/L [36]
50 °C Glucose (2R,3R)-2,3-BDO
meso-2,3-BDO
123.7 g/L
90.1 g/L
[37]
50 °C Glucose Acetoin 64.2 g/L [38]
50 °C Artichoke tubers meso-2,3-BDO 82.5 g/L [29]
50 °C Corn stover hydrolysate 2,3-BDO 74.0 g/L [39]
50 °C Food waste 2,3-BDO 5.9 g/L [40]
Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius 60 °C Glucose L-lactic acid 151.1 g/L [41]
D-lactic acid 153.1 g/L
60 °C Glucose Riboflavin 1034.5 mg/L [42]
Bacillus coagulans 50 °C Glucose L-lactic acid 64.2 g/L [43]
45 °C Glucose Malic acid 25.5 g/L [44]
Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27 55 °C Lignocellulosic hydrolysates Ethanol 0.46–0.53 g/g [48]
50 °C Cane molasses Ethanol 34 g/L [49]
50 °C Cane molasse Butanol 3.22 g/L [49]
Clostridium thermocellum 55 °C Xylose and cellulose Ethanol 12 mM [56]
50 °C Cellulose Isobutanol 5.4 g/L [53]
55 °C Cellulose Isobutanol 5.1 g/L [67]
55 °C Cellulose Ethanol 29.9 g/L [54]
55 °C Cellulose N-butanol 357 mg/L [54]
55 °C Lignocellulosic biomass Short-chain sters 200 mg/L [55]
55 °C Cellulose L-lactic acid 9.9 g/L [68]
Myceliophthora thermophila 48 °C Cellobiose Ethanol 11.3 g/L [59]
45 °C Cellulose Ethanol 52.8 g/L [59]
45 °C Corncob Ethanol 39.8 g/L [60]
45 °C Glucose Fumaric acid 17 g/L [61]
Bacillus methanolicus MGA3 50 °C Methanol L-glutamate 69 g/L [65]
50 °C Methanol L-lysine 11 g/L [65]
50 °C Methanol Riboflavin 523 mg/L [66]

2.3. Sustainable Biorefining and Environmental Applications 2.3.1. Lignin Biorefining Lignocellulose is the primary component of agricultural and forestry waste, characterized by its dense and complex structure, which hinders its biological degradation and conversion. The development of efficient biocatalysts is crucial for the bioconversion of lignocellulose [69]. Second-generation biofuel ethanol derived from lignocellulose is an environmentally friendly gasoline substitute, achieving a greenhouse gas emission reduction of up to 115%, significantly surpassing the 19% to 48% reduction associated with food-based ethanol. Therefore, the development of cellulose-derived ethanol is of great importance for addressing food security and energy security issues [70]. C. thermocellum is an efficient cellulose-degrading bacterium that degrades the polysaccharide components of lignocellulose through the secretion of cellulosomes, a multienzyme complex, demonstrating superior degradation efficiency compared to the free cellulase systems secreted by fungi [28,71]. Despite C. thermocellum’s ability to directly utilize cellulose, its ethanol production has been low. To enhance yields, researchers have employed a functionally complementary microbial co-cultivation strategy. By co-cultivating C. thermocellum with Thermoanaerobacter saccharolyticum and blocking the pathways for lactic acid and acetic acid synthesis, the adapted mixed culture achieved an ethanol yield of 38 g/L from Avicel at 55 °C, approaching 80% of the theoretical maximum yield [72]. This microbial co-cultivation system not only eliminates the need for complex metabolic engineering but also broadens the biorefining platform for lignocellulose, enhancing refining efficiency [73]. Furthermore, this system has proven effective for the production of succinate and butanol from lignin [74,75]. Hydrogen, as a clean energy source, is increasingly recognized for its environmental sustainability throughout production. Research has reported that certain thermophilic anaerobic consortia can utilize untreated cassava mash as a substrate to produce hydrogen gas at 60 °C, achieving H2 yields of up to 760 mL/L [76]. Thermophilic anaerobes such as C. thermocellum and Thermotoga neapolitana have been employed in the anaerobic fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass for H2 production [77]. Thermoanaerobacterium sp. strain F6 is capable of directly utilizing hemicellulosic and cellulolytic materials to generate hydrogen at temperatures as high as 1822.6 mL/L [78]. 2.3.2. Biodegradable Plastics Production The application of thermophilic microorganisms in the production of biodegradable bioplastics represents a significant breakthrough, as they efficiently convert renewable substrates into valuable bioplastic precursors [79,80]. For instance, Cupriavidus caudatus PHS1 is a strain capable of synthesizing polyhydroxybutyrate (PHA) from various substrates. When cultured with gluconate at 45 °C, this strain accumulated a PHB content of 47% within a dry cell weight (DCW) of 3.14 g/L, approximately 13 times higher than the yield observed at 25 °C [81]. The strain Aneurinibacillus sp. H1, isolated from compost, produced 2.03 g/L of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from glycerol, accounting for 55.31% DCW at its optimal growth temperature of 45 °C [82]. The thermophilic bacteria Weizmannia coagulans MA-13 (formerly Bacillus coagulans) and Caldicellulosiruptor sp.DIB 104C has been shown to effectively convert sugars derived from lignocellulose into lactate, a precursor of polylactic acid (PLA), under fermentation conditions at 55 °C [83,84,85]. 2.3.3. Lipids Production Thermophilic microorganisms possess significant potential in lipid production, which are key raw materials for biodiesel production [86]. Particularly, microalgae are considered ideal hosts for biodiesel production due to their high lipid content and rapid growth rates [30]. Typically, the lipid content of microalgae comprises 20% to 50% of their dry weight, with some species exceeding 80% lipid content [87,88]. Thermophilic microalgae have an optimal growth temperature that exceeds the typical range of 16–27 °C for regular microalgae, often around 50 °C. Furthermore, thermophilic algae have a significant advantage in biodiesel production due to their heat-stable enzymes, which maintain activity at high temperatures, thereby enhancing their potential in biofuel production [89]. A study comparing the lipid content of Gloeocapsa gelatinosa, isolated from the hot spring “Aïn Echfa” at 60 °C, revealed that high light intensity combined with high temperature (60 °C) and the lowest NaNO3 concentration increased the proportion of saturated fatty acids 16:0 and 18:0 [90]. Chlorella sorokiniana can tolerate high temperatures of up to 42 °C, with an optimal growth temperature of 37 °C. Under these conditions, its maximum lipid content reached 31.5%, and the lipid productivity reached 2.9 g/L/d [91]. These findings make thermophilic microalgae promising candidates for sustainable biofuel production. 2.3.4. Environmental Remediation Biodegradation of plastics The use of thermophilic microorganisms for plastic degradation in contaminated thermal habitats offers significant advantages, as high-temperature environments alter the physical and optical properties of plastics, enhancing their bioavailability and solubility [92]. Through metagenomic analysis, researchers identified Brevibacillus thermoruber in plastic-polluted geothermal areas, which exhibited high degradation activity against poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) at 55 °C, accounting for 63.6% of the total microbial community’s degradation capacity [93]. Streptomyces thermoviolaceus can secrete extracellular PCL depolymerases, achieving complete degradation of 0.1% of the substrate after 6 h at 45 °C [94]. A thermophilic whole-cell catalyst capable of degrading polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was constructed by expressing heterologous thermophilic cutinase in C. thermocellum. Significant degradation of commercial PET films was observed at 60 °C, with more than 60% of the initial mass (approximately 50 mg) being degraded. [95]. Bacillus pallidus, a thermophilic bacterium, was able to degrade nylon 12 and nylon 6 at 60 °C [96]. Wastewater Treatment Thermophilic microalgae exhibit significant potential for applications in wastewater treatment. They effectively remove nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and organic compounds while converting biomass into energy and materials [97]. They can directly grow in the hot wastewater upon discharge, eliminating the need for a cooling step and simplifying subsequent wastewater treatment. Additionally, the elevated temperature accelerates chemical reaction rates, significantly enhancing pollutant degradation efficiency and making the treatment process more efficient compared to traditional methods [98]. For example, G. sulphuraria can grow at 56 °C, showing promise in treating wastewater derived from food waste hydrolysates [99,100]. In primary settling wastewater, G. sulphuraria significantly reduced the concentrations of organic carbon, ammonium, and phosphates, achieving removal rates of 46–72%, 63–89%, and 71–95%, respectively [101]. Furthermore, the bacterial count in the treated wastewater is markedly decreased, with the complete elimination of Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli [102]. Chlorella thermophila, a thermophilic microalga, has been cultivated in nutrient-rich dairy wastewater, effectively reducing organic carbon and nutrient loads, while the extracted biomass demonstrated the ability to inhibit the growth of plant pathogens [103]. Co-culture systems, such as Streptomyces thermocarboxydus in conjunction with Chlorella sorokiniana, facilitated biodiesel production while treating cassava biogas wastewater, with biomass and lipid yields increasing by 21% and 25%, respectively [104]. Metal Recovery In metal bioremediation, microorganisms stabilize or transform metal ions through enzymatic or non-enzymatic oxidation/reduction reactions, thereby reducing their ecological risks [105]. Additionally, microbial surface adsorption and the secretion of metabolites such as amino acids, proteins, and peptides can precipitate with metal ions, further stabilizing them [106]. Thermophilic microorganisms exhibit unique advantages in exothermic bioleaching processes, as they not only adapt to high-temperature environments but also mitigate mineral surface passivation, thereby enhancing metal recovery efficiency [107]. Through mixed cultures of thermophilic bacteria, effective biolixiviation of pretreated waste printed circuit boards (PCBs) has been achieved, with recovery rates for Zn, Cu, and Al reaching 85.23%, 76.59%, and 70.16%, respectively, within seven days. Within this community, two thermophilic bacterial species, Leptospirillum ferriphilum and Acidithiobacillus caldus, were identified and both exhibited robust performance in the bioleaching process [108]. In another study, thermophilic microbial communities were employed for the biolixiviation of various metals from contaminated sediments. The co-culture system of Sulfobacillus thermotolerans and Acidithiobacillus caldus demonstrated superior acidification efficiency and redox potential, significantly enhancing the bioleaching of sulfur and pyrite. S. thermotolerans further reduced toxicity by oxidizing leachate byproducts, facilitating the bioleaching process. Compared to monocultures, the co-culture exhibited higher proliferation rates and cell densities, further validating the synergistic effect and contributing to improved bioleaching efficiency [109]. These indicated that thermophilic microorganisms not only enhance metal recovery efficiency in biolixiviation but also play a crucial role in environmental remediation, particularly in the treatment of industrial wastewater and sludge contaminated with heavy metals. 2.4. Acting as the Evolving Platform of Thermophilic Enzymes 2.4.1. Co-Evolution of Thermophilic Enzymes and Thermophiles Thermophiles employ a range of adaptive mechanisms to survive and reproduce in high-temperature environments. These adaptations are closely linked to the co-evolution of thermozymes, ensuring cellular functions such as DNA synthesis, protein expression and cell metabolism remain stable and efficient under extreme conditions [110]. Thermophilic bacteria enhance the stability of their cell membranes by increasing the proportion of saturated fatty acids, extending phospholipid alkyl chain lengths, and incorporating more isomerized branched chains. These optimizations not only improve the rigidity and stability of the membrane but also provide a more stable cellular environment for enzymes, ensuring their structures and functions [111,112]. High temperatures pose significant threats to DNA integrity, driving thermophilic microorganisms to evolve stable nucleic acid structures and efficient DNA repair systems, where thermally stable repair enzymes have co-evolved to indirectly ensure the accuracy of protein synthesis [113]. For instance, the DNA-guided Argonaute protein TtAgo in Thermus thermophilus aided in the replication of the circular genome and conferred a competitive advantage to the organism [114]. Additionally, the genomes of thermophiles contain specific enzymes that induce negative supercoiling to maintain DNA stability [115,116]. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) protect intracellular proteins from misfolding or aggregation, inhibit cascades of cell death signaling, and preserve intracellular signaling pathways essential for the cell viability of thermophiles [117,118]. Methanosarcina thermophila TM-1 possesses an active Hsp70 chaperone machine that induces a heat shock response, along with the stress gene trkA, which exhibits induction activity similar to classic heat shock genes [119]. The expression of heat shock protein-related genes has been enhanced at high temperatures to facilitate proper protein folding and maintain functionality [120,121]. Enzymes have gradually evolved to maintain activity and stability at elevated temperatures through mutation accumulation and natural selection, thereby supporting cellular survival in extreme environments [122,123]. Firstly, thermozymes have evolved their amino acid composition and structural characteristics to maintain stability at high temperatures. Compared to mesophilic proteins, thermophilic enzymes contain a higher number of charged amino acids, which stabilize the protein structure through electrostatic interactions [124,125]. Aromatic amino acids further enhance protein stability through cation-π interactions [126,127,128]. Secondly, the intramolecular interactions of thermozymes have also evolved, including both covalent bonds and non-covalent forces [129,130,131]. For example, strong electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions prevent aggregation and enhance the stability of thermophilic proteins [37,132]. Though high temperatures destabilize proteins by increasing entropy, disulfide bonds between cysteines stabilize protein structure [133,134,135]. Moreover, thermophilic proteins are more rigid than mesophilic proteins, providing stronger structural support [136,137]. Elevated proline content also enhances protein rigidity and thermal stability, while glycine reduces the stability due to high entropy [138,139,140,141,142]. Extreme thermophilic proteins minimize destabilization from solvation by burying hydrophobic surface area [143,144]. 2.4.2. Serving as the High-Value Reservoir of Thermozymes Thermophilic bacteria are considered a valuable reservoir of thermozymes. To date, various thermozymes have been characterized, such as xylanases, proteases, cellulases, amylases, and lipases [11]. These enzymes exhibit high catalytic activity at elevated temperatures, offering advantages such as ease of expression in mesophilic hosts, enhanced substrate solubility and reduced viscosity for improved reaction efficiency, minimized microbial contamination, and increased resistance to chemical denaturants, making them ideal for complex industrial applications [12]. Thermozymes have achieved numerous successful applications in commercial industries. For example, Lipozyme® TL IM, a thermophilic lipase derived from Thermomyces lanuginosus and developed by Novozymes, is widely used in the stereoselective hydrolysis and transesterification of esters, while the company’s thermostable laccase product, Denilite® IIS, is commonly employed in textile industries for processes such as fabric bleaching [145,146]. ASA Spezialenzyme GmbH has developed Xylanase 2X®, sourced from Trichoderma sp., primarily for the degradation of cellulose [147]. These applications highlight the tremendous potential and broad utilization of thermophilic enzymes across various industrial sectors. Representative thermozymes with potential application values are listed in Table 2. Thermophilic lipases, characterized by their exceptional lipid solubilization capacity, have extensive applications in detergents, the paper industry, and biodiesel production. These enzymes have been identified from a wide range of bacterial sources, including Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Acinetobacter, highlighting their versatility and industrial significance [148]. For example, a highly thermostable lipase has been isolated from Bacillus stearothermophilus, with a remarkable half-life of 15–25 min at 100 °C and an optimal catalytic temperature of 78 °C [149]. Similarly, lipases derived from Pseudomonas moraviensis and Thermosyntropha lipolytica exhibit optimal enzymatic activity at 65 °C and 96 °C, respectively, underscoring their potential for high-temperature industrial applications [150,151]. Chitinase is capable of converting insoluble chitin into bioactive chito-oligosaccharides and monomers, and degrading the chitin exoskeleton or cell walls of pathogens to inhibit their growth, thereby playing an important role in the skincare industry and biological control [152]. The chitinase from B. licheniformis MB-2 performs optimally at 70 °C [153]. Cellulase and amylase have been applied in the food industry and the paper industry, where they enhance fiber softness and uniformity, thereby improving paper quality [154]. A thermophilic amylase (PaAFG) screened out from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi showed maximum activity at 90 °C and exceptional thermal stability between 60–100 °C [155]. In the field of molecular biology, thermozymes are highly valued for their ability to maintain activity at elevated temperatures. A notable example was the DNA polymerase, which has been isolated from the thermophilic bacteria such as Thermus aquaticus and Thermococcus barophilus [156,157,158]. Additionally, DNA ligases have also been isolated and characterized from Thermococcus sp. 1519, Pyrococcus furiosus, and Staphylothermus marinus [159,160,161]. The DNA ligase derived from Thermococcus sp. 1519 exhibited optimal activity at 60–70 °C and was capable of ligating DNA fragments with long overhangs, making it a promising tool for Gibson assembly application [159].

Table 2. Representative thermozymes with potential applications in industry and scientific research.

Scenario Thermozymes Optimal Temperature Application Organism Reference
Foods α-amylase 90 °C Enhancing dough fermentation in baking; Advancing product quality, fermentation efficiency, and clarity in the brewing industry. Pyrococcus abyssi [155]
Xylanase 70–75 °C Myceliophthora thermophila [162]
Cellulase 102–105 °C Pyrococcus furiosus [163]
Pectinases 90–100 °C Thermotoga maritima [164]
Mannanase 60 °C Reducing viscosity, enhancing texture, and improving beverage clarity. Aspergillus fumigatus HBFH5 [165]
Personal and household care products α-amylase 90 °C Improving paper quality and enhancing bleaching processes in the paper industry. Pyrococcus abyssi [155]
Cellulase 75 °C Caldicellulosiruptor bescii [166]
Pectinases 90–100 °C Thermotoga maritima [164]
Lipases 70 °C Geobacillus stearothermophilus [167]
Laccase 90 °C Chitinophaga sp. CB10 [168]
Glucoamylases 75 °C Effectively breaking down starch-based stains for enhanced detergent performance. Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus [169]
Proteinase 60 °C Effectively removing blood, milk, and similar stains to enhance detergent performance. Thermus thermophilus HB8 [170]
Esterase 60 °C Breaking down grease and oil stains to enhance detergent performance. Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2 [171]
Lipases 70 °C Geobacillus stearothermophilus [167]
78 °C Fervidobacterium changbaicum CBS-1 [149]
Lipases 65 °C Biodiesel production. Burkholderia ubonensis SL-4 [172]
Chitinase 90 °C Production of chitosan for applications in moisturizing skincare products. Thermotogae bacterium [173]
Environmental protection Esterase 80 °C Decomposing ester compounds in wastewater or pesticides. Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571 [174]
Laccase 60 °C Removing phenolic contaminants from industrial wastewater; degrading pesticide residues. Geobacillus yumthangensis [175]
Chitinase 45 °C As a biocontrol agent. Streptomyces alfalfae ACCC 40021 [176]
Molecular biology DNA polymerases 80 °C PCR. Thermus aquaticus [156]
72–74 °C Thermus scotoductus K1 [177]
Ligases 70 °C Ligase chain reaction. Thermococcus sp. 1519 [160]

2.5. High-Temperature Whole-Cell Catalysis Whole-cell biocatalysts (WCBs) utilize the entire cell to carry out catalytic reactions, eliminating the requirement for additional cofactors and the processes of enzyme purification [178]. These systems are highly stable and reproducible, but low production efficiency remains a challenge. For example, industrial strains like E. coli grow optimally at 37 °C, yet the complexity of intracellular enzymes and metabolite interactions limit the efficiency [34]. Elevated temperatures simplify the metabolism by reducing side reactions and byproduct formation, enabling high-selectivity whole-cell biocatalysts with yields comparable to purified enzymes [179]. Researchers have identified hydrogen-dependent CO2 reductases (HDCRs) in the thermophilic acetic acid bacteria Acetobacterium woodii and Thermoanaerobacter kivui, which efficiently catalyzed the conversion of CO2 to formic acid. Leveraging this enzyme, they developed a whole-cell biocatalyst to convert H2 and CO2 into formic acid, showing potential applications in hydrogen storage and CO2 capture [180]. Additionally, a thermally stable lipase from Geobacillus thermocatenulatus (BTL2) was introduced into Aspergillus oryzae to generate an immobilized whole-cell biocatalyst, which retained high activity at 60 °C. This catalyst effectively converted palm oil into biodiesel, achieving conversion rates close to 100% at elevated temperatures between 40 °C and 50 °C [181]. There have been reports of WCBs utilizing thermozymes expressed in non-thermophilic bacteria. For instance, by expressing the thermophilic lipase gene from Rhizobium etli in E. coli, researchers catalyzed the ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone, achieving nearly 100% monomer conversion at temperatures between 70 °C and 90 °C. Even after 10 reuse cycles, the monomer conversion rate remained above 90% [182]. Additionally, Peng et al. employed bioinformatics techniques to identify thermophilic N-acetyl-D-glucosamine epimerase (AGE) and N-acetylneuraminic acid aldolase (NanAs) that remain stable and exhibit high enzymatic activity at 60 °C. Utilizing the rapidly growing Vibrio natriegens, they established a high-temperature WCB producing N-acetyl-D-neuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) at an average rate three times higher than that at 37 °C, achieving titers of 126.1 g/L and a productivity of 71.6 g/(L·h), which is 7.2 times higher than that of E. coli [34]. The integrity of the cell membrane in non-thermophilic bacteria like E. coli is compromised at elevated temperatures. This limits the continuous reuse of whole-cell biocatalysts. It is crucial to enhance the efficiency of high-temperature WCB by stabilizing either the enzymes or the cell structure [182]. To address this, glutaraldehyde treatment was applied to E. coli expressing thermophilic fumarase from Thermus thermophilus, stabilizing the system without altering cell structure [179]. Given that circular proteins exhibit greater thermal stability and structural integrity than linear proteins, enzyme cyclization using SpyTag and SpyCatcher has been used to enhance the thermal tolerance and activity of β-glucosidase, improving catalytic efficiency and retaining 50% activity after 10 days of storage at room temperature [183].

3. Bioprospecting, Screening, and Engineering of Thermozymes

The utilization of thermozymes is highly significant in scientific research, industrial applications, and environmental protection. Studying thermozymes enhances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind enzyme evolution and protein thermal stability, laying the groundwork for advancements in protein engineering and molecular biology [184]. The bioprospecting and engineering of these enzymes further promote the development of innovative biotechnologies that greatly improve the efficiency of biocatalysts, which is invaluable for advancing industrial biotechnology and synthetic biology. However, most enzymes lack heat resistance above 50 °C, making the discovery of thermally stable enzymes and the improvement of protein thermal stability important topics in scientific research and industrial applications [185]. Here, we discuss cases of thermophilic enzyme exploration and modification guided by computational methods, artificial intelligence (AI), and high-throughput screening techniques. Representative tools for thermozymes discovery and enzyme thermal stability optimization are listed in Table 3. 3.1. Bioinformatics-Guided Bioprospecting of Thermozymes Enzyme thermal stability is crucial for extending reaction duration and facilitating reusability. Traditional methods for isolating thermozymes typically rely on the extraction from bacteria or archaea found in high-temperature environments. However, these wet-lab processes are relatively expensive and time-consuming. Rapid advancements in molecular biology, bioinformatics, and genomics facilitate the use of sophisticated bioinformatics tools and omics data to discovery novel enzymes. Co-evolution Mining The co-evolution of enzymes and thermophilic microorganisms allows the identification of thermozymes from the thermophilic genomes. To this end, a co-evolutionary platform, Co-Evolution Mining (CEM), has been developed for thermozymes discovery. Using glucosamine-6-phosphate acetyltransferase (GNA1) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a template, 1672 microbial genomes with Topt over 50 °C and high GC content were analyzed. Four novel GNA1 enzymes with excellent stability have been identified, enabling the production of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) at 119.3 g/L [186]. Omics-Based Bioprospecting Protein-coding genes with potential thermophilic properties could be identified utilizing genomic databases by comparing existing thermophilic enzyme sequences. Using reported heat-stable ω-transaminases as templates, a novel heat-stable ω-transaminase was identified from thermophilic microbial genomic databases, retaining nearly unchanged activity below 80 °C and exhibiting typical thermophilic traits [187]. A GeneBank-mining virtual probe to discover thermophilic glucose isomerases has been designed using energy calculations from FoldX and Rosetta. This probe facilitated the identification of two thermophilic enzymes, which retained 40.6% and 52.6% relative residual activity, respectively, after incubation at 90 °C for 24 h [188]. Using Tagatose 4-epimerase UxaE from T. neapolitana as a virtual probe and performing protein clustering, Thar-T4Ease from Thermoprotei archaeon was identified, exhibiting remarkable thermostability with a half-life of 198 h at 80 °C and an 18.9% conversion rate using 100 g/L D-fructose as the substrate [189]. By performing length screening and clustering analysis on 358 sequences from the NCBI database, in combination with structural predictions and substrate docking using AlphaFold, the D-Allulose 3-epimerase (DAEase) from Thermogutta terrifontis was identified, exhibiting a half-life of 32 h at 70 °C [190]. Metagenomics, also known as environmental genomics or community genomics, effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional microbial cultivation methods and has been widely applied to discover novel genes [191,192,193]. For instance, wastewater metagenomes from tanneries have been analyzed and machine learning-based regression models have been used to predict the optimal pH and temperature of lipases, characterizing a newly thermophilic lipase showing maximum activity at 60 °C [194]. Plant composting is a process in which thermophilic microorganisms degrade plant-based polymers. Seven enzymes with polyester hydrolytic activity have been identified from the metagenomic samples from a composting facility, and enzyme PHL7 completely hydrolyzed untreated PET plastic waste at a rate of 0.6 mg/g PET within 24 h at 70 °C [195]. Sun et al. used transcriptomics to analyze protein transcription levels at different composting stages and identified a chitinase, ActChi, which was active at 80 °C. The catalytic activity was further enhanced by 400% by incorporating a hyperthermophilic chitin-binding domain [196].

Table 3. Tools for thermozymes discovery and thermal stability optimization.

Tools Functions Input Type Key Methods URL Reference
TOME Predicting the Topt Sequence SVR https://github.com/EngqvistLab/Tome (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [197]
TOMER Predicting the Topt Sequence SVR https://github.com/jafetgado/tomer (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [198]
Preoptem Predicting the Topt Sequence FNN; CNN http://www.elabcaas.cn/pird/preoptem.html (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [199]
Pythia Predicting the ΔΔG PDB structure MPNN https://pythia.wulab.xyz/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [200]
FoldX Predicting the ΔΔG PDB structure Energy calculation https://foldxsuite.crg.eu/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [201]
ROSETTA Predicting the ΔΔG PDB structure Energy calculation https://rosettacommons.org/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [202]
FireProt2.0 Predicting the ΔΔG and Tm Sequence/PDB structure Bron-Kerbosch https://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/fireprotweb/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [203]
DeepSTABp Predicting the Tm Sequence Transformer https://csb-deepstabp.bio.rptu.de/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [204]
BayeStab Evaluating the impact of single mutations on protein stability PDB structure GNN http://www.bayestab.com. (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [205]
GeoStab-suite Prediction of protein mutation fitness scores, ΔΔG, and ΔTm PDB ID GAT; MLP https://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_geostab.html (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [206]
HotSpot Wizard3.0 Identifying hotspots for enhancing enzyme thermal stability Sequence Energy calculation http://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/hotspotwizard (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [207]
ProThermDB Database of protein thermal stability Sequence / https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/prothermdb/index.html (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [208]
BRENDA Database of enzymes’ optimal temperature EC Number/Name of the Gene or Enzyme / https://www.brenda-enzymes.org/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025 ) [209]
ThermoMutDB Database of protein thermal stability Protein Name/PDB ID / https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/thermomutdb/ (Accessed on 6 January 2025) [210]

SVR: Support Vector Regression; FNN: Feedforward Neural Network; CNN: Convolutional Neural Network; MPNN: Message passing neural network; GNN: Graph Neural Networks; GAT: Graph Attention Network; MLP: multiple layer perceptron; EC: Enzyme Commission Number.

3.2. High-Throughput Screening of Thermostable Enzymes Traditional protein engineering is primarily achieved through rational or semi-rational design and directed evolution techniques. Directed evolution in combination with high-throughput screening method does not require an understanding of protein structures, allowing for the direct identification of advantageous mutations [211]. The high-throughput screening method plays an important role in the evaluation of enzyme activity, stability, and other key performance characteristics, as well as addressing the time and cost challenges associated with multiple rounds of iterative screening. Rational design of enzymes relies on a solid foundation of protein structures and amino acid mutations [212]. Semi-rational design involves the construction of mutant libraries through multiple rounds of mutagenesis, followed by iterative screening of beneficial variants [213]. AI-driven virtual screening approaches combining computational tools and big data analysis present an efficient pathway for enzyme engineering, although experimental validation remains essential. 3.2.1. High-Throughput Screening The high-throughput screening method allows for the quantitative analysis of substrates or target products by measuring the changes in absorbance or fluorescence. For instance, Li et al. developed a high-throughput screening system for D-allulose 3-epimerases (DAEases) by measuring the product D-allulose via determimning NAD+ absorbance at 340 nm, identifying a mutant with 1.2-fold higher activity and 8.7 °C improved thermal stability, compared to the wild-type enzyme’s T5060 value of approximately 70 °C. [214]. To withstand the high temperatures encountered in PET processing, Shi et al. developed a high-throughput screening method to monitor PET hydrolase activity using bis (2-hydroxyethyl) 2-hydroxyterephthalate (BHET-OH) as a novel substrate, producing the fluorescent product and yielding an optimal mutant with a Tm increase of 23.3 °C, from the original Tm of 46.13 °C to a final Tm of 69.38 °C [215]. Agar plate screening technology is useful in assessing enzyme activity through hydrolysis halos or colorimetric reactions. Zhou et al. optimized the agar plate material with improved heat resistance, identifying a hyperthermostable polyphosphate glucokinase mutant with a 7200-fold increase in half-life and a Tm increase of 19.8 °C, from the original Tm of 55.9 °C to a final Tm of 75.7 °C [216]. This method has also been extended to screening thermophiles. Xiong et al. used Congo red agar and colorimetric assays to isolate Streptococcus thermophilus mutants, leading to a 25.42% increase in EPS production [217]. Biosensors are essential in synthetic biology for monitoring microbial behavior, metabolism, and product accumulation. Commonly based on transcription factors or riboswitches, they respond by changing protein or nucleic acid conformation, triggering gene expression, and producing detectable signals like fluorescence, growth rates, or pathway expression levels [218,219]. Biosensors enable rapid evaluation of enzyme activity, stability, and substrate affinity, crucial for directed evolution and high-throughput screening [220]. Using a biosensor specifically responsive to D-allulose, researchers identified DAEase variants with enhanced catalytic efficiency and thermal stability, achieving a half-life 17.23 times longer than the wild type at 65 °C [221]. Similarly, Li et al. utilized a D-allulose-responsive biosensor to design an in vivo growth-coupled screening platform, significantly improving the thermal stability of ketose 3-epimerase (KEase) through directed evolution [222]. Biosensors that reassemble split GFP fragments to produce fluorescence upon ligand binding have been used for assessing enzyme stability and solubility [223]. Leveraging this type of biosensor, researchers have identified the mutant of thermostable esterase Aaeo1, I51V-E170D, that possesses 4.5-fold higher activity than the wild type [224]. 3.2.2. AI-Driven Prediction and Iterative Virtual Screening AlphaFold is a revolutionary tool utilizing deep neural networks, integrating sequence data from known structures, co-evolutionary information, and distance and angle data between amino acids, to predict the three-dimensional (3D) structure of target proteins through iterative training and testing [225,226]. The combination of AlphaFold2 and Rosetta methods significantly enhances the accuracy of enzyme thermal stability predictions. For example, a computational protocol using AlphaFold and Rosetta integrated global conformational sampling with energy predictions, improving the prediction of enzyme thermal stability substantially [227]. A Co-Evolution Mining (CEM) tool has been developed to search for thermophilic NanA, and 92 proteins with structures predicted by AlphaFold2 were subjected to molecular docking with GlcNAc and pyruvate [34]. Further assessments of protein stability and aggregation propensity using FoldX and Aggrescan3D identified the N-acetylneuraminic acid aldolase (AGE) from Thermophagus xiamenensis as the best candidate, which exhibited an optimal temperature of 65 °C and retaining over 50% of its initial activity after 60 h of treatment. Wang et al. designed an Ancestral Sequence-Structure-Molecular Dynamics (ASSMD) strategy to explore ancestral enzyme sequences [228]. They established a comprehensive structure library for ancestral nitrilase enzymes by predicting their structures by AlphaFold 2.0. Additionally, they generated a dynamic parameter library that revealed the biochemical properties of these enzymes via molecular dynamics simulations and provided insights into the structural rigidity of the protein dynamics by analyzing the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). Notably, they identified an ancestral enzyme ASR135 remaining with the residual enzymatic activity at 11.69% after incubation at 90 °C for 10 min. The laboratory evolution further enhanced the thermal stability of ASR135, yielding the mutant ASR135-M4 retaining hydrolytic activity even at 100 °C. The implementation of AI-driven virtual screening method leverages cloud platforms to perform massive computations and cluster architecture calculations, enabling iterative virtual screening of thermostable enzymes [229]. For example, sequence similarity-based annotations and supervised learning algorithms have been employed to characterize cellulose-degrading enzymes from high-throughput metagenomic data. Through iterative cross-validation testing, a heat-stable cellulose-degrading enzyme was successfully identified [230]. Zhang et al. developed a deep learning tool, Preoptem, to screen thermophilic proteins from a marine metagenome and predicted 23.82% of 3199 proteins were thermophilic, leading to the discovery of a thermophilic chitinase, Chi304, with a Tm of 89.65 ± 0.22 °C [199]. AI-driven iterative virtual screening is also applicable to the screening of enzyme mutants. Xi et al. performed virtual saturation mutagenesis on the dimeric interface residues of L-lysine decarboxylase (CadA), in combination with computationally guided virtual screening, obtaining an optimized mutant with enhanced stability under high-temperature and high-pH conditions, and increasing cadaverine production by 37% at 50 °C and pH 8.0 [231]. Similarly, Li et al. applied a dual-focusing strategy combining hierarchical clustering and iterative screening to develop thermostable methylphosphonic acid hydrolase (MPH), obtaining a mutant with a 13.3 °C Tm increase and 4.2-fold higher catalytic activity [232]. Qi et al. employed structure-guided virtual screening and a combinatorial active site saturation testing/iterative saturation mutagenesis custom strategy to engineer D-allulose 3-epimerase (DAEase) from T. terrifontis, obtaining a mutant (P105A/L14C/T63G/I65A) displaying a 5.12-fold increase in catalytic activity [233]. 3.3. AI-Guided Design and Engineering of Thermostable Enzymes AI is crucial in identifying, optimizing, and designing thermally stable enzymes [234]. By analyzing structural, mutation, and experimental data, AI predicts stability changes and guides protein engineering, reducing experimental reliance [235,236]. Integrating AI with bioinformatics enhances our understanding of enzyme behavior at high temperatures, advancing enzyme development for industrial and biotechnological applications [237]. Figure 3 depicts the general workflow of using machine learning to predict and enhance enzyme thermal stability. First, data processing involves collecting and extracting key features such as Tm and Topt to prepare for subsequent analysis. Next, the modeling phase uses neural networks to build a predictive model for enzyme thermostability. Finally, the prediction and design step applies the model to evaluate enzyme performance and optimize critical sites through hotspot design, thereby enhancing enzyme stability under high temperatures. Machine learning techniques have been utilized to enhance the thermal stability of pectate lyase PMGL-Ba from Bacillus stearothermophilus by training and optimizing various amino acid features of 152 mutants. Among the six regression algorithms, the Support Vector Regression (SVR) model performed the best in predicting thermal stability. Using this model, the mutant P36 exhibited a significantly improved half-life at 75 °C and 80 °C and an increased activity by 2.1 times was characterized [238]. Yoshida et al. developed a loop-walking method to improve protein thermal stability by introducing random mutations into three consecutive amino acid residues within each loop. The critical loop region L7 was characterized using a discriminative model with the physicochemical parameters of each amino acid position as input and the thermal stability of 214 mutants as output. This approach identified the mutant P233D/L234P/V235S, which retained 66% activity after heat treatment at 60 °C, significantly higher than the wild-type enzyme (5%) [239]. Deep learning models use multi-layer neural networks to handle and analyze vast amounts of protein structural and sequence information [240]. For example, MutCompute24 is an algorithm developed using a three-dimensional (3D) self-supervised convolutional neural network (CNN). It learns variations in the local microenvironment of amino acids from extensive structural information in the PDB database to determine whether structural changes are beneficial for protein stability [241]. Lu et al. employed this model to predict mutations that enhance the thermal stability of the plastic-degrading enzyme PETase, finding that 85% of 27 potential mutation combinations exhibit greater thermal stability compared to the starting enzyme [242]. A CNN algorithm, developed using a dataset of single amino acid mutation data (S3661) selected from the ProTherm protein thermodynamic database, has been demonstrated to be more accurate than traditional methods in predicting the thermal stability of mutants of Rhizomucor miehei lipase [243]. Liao et al. introduced the concept of the protein bottleneck effect, highlighting that the thermal stability of a protein is constrained by its least stable region. Using α-Amylase as a model, they identified its B domain as the critical region. They then developed the Zero-Shot Hamiltonian (ZSH) model, based on the MSA Transformer protein language model, to predict thermal stability changes from double mutations, successfully identifying a mutant F237R/S240G with an 8.5 °C increase in Tm [244].
Figure 3. General workflow of machine learning-assisted protein thermostability design.

4. Economic and Environmental Effects of High-Temperature Catalytic Platform

Balancing environmental sustainability with economic viability has become a critical focus in the development of industrial biotechnology [63]. Biological fermentation serves as the foundation of industrial biotechnology. However, most fermentation processes are highly sensitive to microbial contamination, necessitating energy-intensive sterilization processes [13].To enhance the economic competitiveness of bioproducts, there is an increasing emphasis on developing open (non-sterile) and continuous fermentation. Thermophilic microorganisms maintain the activity in high-temperature environments, allowing for open fermentation at thermophilic temperatures [35]. This not only improves the substrate conversion rates and minimizes the risk of contamination, but also reduces the significant cooling costs associated with apparatus sterilization, conserving water resources. Moreover, under high-temperature conditions, the accelerated microbial metabolic rates and increased substrate solubility further enhance production efficiency. Open fermentation processes utilizing thermophiles have been applied to the production of products such as L-lactic acid, ethanol, and γ-polyglutamic acid [245]. For example, the thermophilic anaerobe Thermoanaerobacter BG1L1 facilitated ethanol production through fermentation at 70 °C, minimizing contamination and simplifying ethanol separation [246]. The application of thermophilic microorganisms offers unique advantages in environmental remediation and resource recovery. An increase in temperature can enhance the diffusion coefficient and mass transfer rate, reduce the viscosity of organic compounds, and improve the bioavailability of pollutants, thereby increasing the efficiency of bioremediation. Meanwhile, appropriate temperature elevation can enhance microbial activity, while promoting the accumulation of enzymes, extracellular polysaccharides, and biosurfactants, further improving the bioremediation efficacy [247]. In wastewater treatment, thermophilic microorganisms effectively degrade organic matter, enhancing treatment efficiency and facilitating water resource recovery [97]. In bioremediation, they can degrade pollutants under extreme conditions, recovering heavy metals and providing low-cost solutions for pollution management [109]. During biomass processing (composting), thermophilic microorganisms accelerate the decomposition of organic matter, thereby reducing the emissions of harmful gases such as NO and H2S, which mitigates atmospheric pollution [248]. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biohydrogen production at thermophilic temperatures (55 °C) revealed that using beet molasses as an organic waste stream exhibited the best environmental performance, with an energy surplus of up to 155%, representing a sustainable energy process for biohydrogen production [249]. The application of thermophilic microorganisms also circumvents the challenges associated with wastewater treatment due to halophile cultivation [250]. These characteristics make thermophilic microorganisms particularly attractive in industrial biotechnology, especially in the context of seeking environmentally friendly solutions. While economic feasibility studies for open fermentation with thermophiles are rare, their economic benefits have been confirmed in other contexts. Using Halomonas TD01 in open continuous fermentation reduced PHA production costs to $2.3/kg, nearly 50% lower than the $4/kg for fed-batch fermentation [35]. Similarly, non-sterile solid-state fungal pretreatment for sugar production lowered costs by 14.5%, equal to €2.15/kg [251]. Non-sterile fermentation also enhanced nutritional quality and bioactivity, as demonstrated by Bacillus stearothermophilus-mediated fermentation of soybean meal, which improved protein, peptide content, and antioxidant activity compared to the sterilized ones [252]. On the other hand, while thermophilic microorganisms offer significant advantages in reducing industrial cooling costs, their production capacity in actual processes must be considered, particularly when comparing profitability with conventional microorganisms. For instance, in the production of 2,3-BDO using glucose as the carbon source, Klebsiella pneumoniae achieved a maximum concentration of 150 g/L within 38 h at 37 °C, with a productivity of 4.21 g/L/h [253]. In contrast, although thermophilic B. licheniformis demonstrates comparable production levels in high-temperature fermentation, its productivity (2.95 g/L/h) is noticeably lower than that of K. pneumoniae, leading to higher energy consumption [37]. However, it is important to recognize the unique advantages of thermophilic microorganisms, such as their ability to utilize diverse biomass substrates and even waste materials. Leveraging these strengths to develop efficient microbial cell factories could enable profitable production models using inexpensive feedstocks [39,40,57].

5. Future Perspectives

5.1. Metabolic Engineering Potential of Thermophilic Microorganisms Thermophilic microorganisms, due to their unique metabolic characteristics, are becoming increasingly important in the field of industrial biotechnology. However, challenges remain in utilizing thermophilic microorganisms to synthesize complex compounds. Advancing metabolic engineering techniques for microorganisms, particularly the discovery or modification of whole-pathway enzymes with thermal stability and high catalytic activity presents a significant challenge. The compatibility of these enzymes across different species may be limited, and their activities can be regulated by mechanisms such as feedback inhibition, adding complexity to the engineering process [254]. The difficulty of genetic manipulation also poses a major challenge in the application of thermophilic microorganisms. Advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 technology have expanded genetic editing capabilities in thermophilic microorganisms, despite ongoing challenges like low editing efficiency [255]. Establishing efficient genome editing methods by optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 and exploring native CRISPR systems may overcome these challenges and broadening the industrial biotechnology applications of thermophilic microorganisms (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Perspectives of leveraging thermophiles and thermozymes as high-temperature catalysts.
5.2. One-Carbon Bioconversion of Methylotrophic Thermophiles One-carbon bioconversion technology is increasingly emerging as a research focus, with methylotrophic microorganisms being pivotal in this burgeoning field. Despite the nascent stage of research on methylotrophic thermophiles, species like thermophilic Bacillus methanolicus and methanotrophs have shown significant potential in methane metabolism. Research indicated that microbial-mediated methane oxidation processes consume over 50% of global methane emissions annually [256]. Advanced techniques like metagenomics and metabolomics enhance our understanding of methylotrophic thermophilic microorganisms’ metabolism and distribution patterns [257]. As synthetic biology progresses, these thermophiles are poised to significantly impact one-carbon bioconversion, providing novel approaches to carbon capture and conversion. 5.3. Implementation of Revolutionary AI and High-Throughput Technologies Recent studies have used computational models to achieve up to 100% prediction accuracy in thermozyme activity, making a significant advancement in thermozymes customization [258]. These endeavours improve experimental outcomes and enzyme customization possibilities. Consequently, AI-driven approaches are transforming traditional Design-Build-Test (DBT) models into more efficient Design-Build-Test-Learn-Predict (DBTLP) workflows, enhancing efficiency and reducing labor [259,260]. Deep learning models further enable the de novo design of thermophilic enzymes by learning from natural protein sequence distributions. As DNA sequencing costs drop and computational power advances, AI technology is expected to play an increasingly pivotal role in developing thermophilic enzymes, promising further innovations in this field. High-throughput platforms like droplet microfluidic technologies (FADS, AADS, MADS) can handle millions of samples, combining fluorescence, absorbance, and mass spectrometry to enhance enzyme activity detection. However, temperature control in high-temperature droplet processing is still challenging [261,262]. Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) offers advantages in high-throughput screening scenarios by being easily automated and adjustable for specific needs, allowing direct mutant protein function detection and speeding up new enzyme design and screening [263,264]. The combination of machine learning, droplet microfluidics, and CFPS technology could revolutionize thermozymes screening and customization, potentially driving breakthroughs in the field of industrial biotechnology.

6. Conclusions

Thermophilic microorganisms, due to their robust growth and contamination resistance at high temperatures, are prime candidates for NGIB chassis. These microbes boost biomanufacturing efficiency and sustainability, offering novel strategies in biofuels, biocatalysis, and environmental cleanup. Their enzymes have wide applications, and researchers have harnessed thermozyme sequences and structures to improve mesophilic enzyme stability. This review examines the advances of thermophiles and thermozymes, highlighting their significant roles as high-temperature catalysts in NGIB. It also highlights advanced technologies like AI and high-throughput screening technologies in thermozyme discovery and development, along with the economic and environmental benefits of thermophilic operations. The review demonstrates that advances in these fields could significantly enhance industrial biocatalysis, supporting a more efficient and eco-friendly bioeconomy aligned with global carbon neutrality goals.

Acknowledgments

Our experiments related to this review were carried out in Biological & Medical Engineering Core Facilities of Beijing Institute of Technology.

Author Contributions

J.L.: Investigation, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. L.S.: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Project administration. Y.-X.H.: Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing, Project administration.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Hebei Natural Science Foundation (C2023105022), Science and Technology Program of Tangshan (23130228E), the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars, and the BIT Research and Innovation Promoting Project (Grant No. 2024YCXY048).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

1.
Kircher M. BioeconomyPresent status and future needs of industrial value chains. New Biotechnol. 2021, 60, 96–104. [Google Scholar]
2.
Zhang Y-HP, Sun J, Ma Y. Biomanufacturing: history and perspective. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 773–784. [Google Scholar]
3.
Scown CD, Keasling JD. Sustainable manufacturing with synthetic biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 304–307. [Google Scholar]
4.
Chen G-Q, Jiang X-R. Next generation industrial biotechnology based on extremophilic bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 50, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
5.
Yu L-P, Wu F-Q, Chen G-Q. Next-Generation Industrial Biotechnology-Transforming the Current Industrial Biotechnology into Competitive Processes. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1800437. [Google Scholar]
6.
Xiao Z, Wang X, Huang Y, Huo F, Zhu X, Xi L, et al. Thermophilic fermentation of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol by a novel Geobacillus strain. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 88. [Google Scholar]
7.
Karim AA, Martínez-Cartas ML, Cuevas-Aranda M. Fermentation of Sugar by Thermotolerant Hansenula polymorpha Yeast for Ethanol Production. Fermentation 2024, 10, 260. doi:10.3390/fermentation10050260.[Google Scholar]
8.
Zeldes BM, Keller MW, Loder AJ, Straub CT, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. Extremely thermophilic microorganisms as metabolic engineering platforms for production of fuels and industrial chemicals. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1209. [Google Scholar]
9.
Ye J-W, Lin Y-N, Yi X-Q, Yu Z-X, Liu X, Chen G-Q. Synthetic biology of extremophiles: A new wave of biomanufacturing. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 342–357. [Google Scholar]
10.
Jing X, Evangelista Falcon W, Baudry J, Serpersu EH. Thermophilic Enzyme or Mesophilic Enzyme with Enhanced Thermostability: Can We Draw a Line? J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 7086–7094. [Google Scholar]
11.
Atalah J, Cáceres-Moreno P, Espina G, Blamey JM. Thermophiles and the applications of their enzymes as new biocatalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 478–488. [Google Scholar]
12.
Dumorné K, Córdova DC, Astorga-Eló M, Renganathan P. Extremozymes: A Potential Source for Industrial Applications. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 649–659. [Google Scholar]
13.
Lee JA, Kim HU, Na J-G, Ko Y-S, Cho JS, Lee SY. Factors affecting the competitiveness of bacterial fermentation. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 798–816. [Google Scholar]
14.
Lieph R, Veloso FA, Holmes DS. Thermophiles like hot T. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 423–426. [Google Scholar]
15.
Leng H, Wang Y, Zhao W, Sievert SM, Xiao X. Identification of a deep-branching thermophilic clade sheds light on early bacterial evolution. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4354. [Google Scholar]
16.
Arbab S, Ullah H, Khan MIU, Khattak MNK, Zhang J, Li K, et al. Diversity and distribution of thermophilic microorganisms and their applications in biotechnology. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2022, 62, 95–108. [Google Scholar]
17.
Narsing Rao MP, Luo Z-H, Dong Z-Y, Li Q, Liu B-B, Guo S-X, et al. Metagenomic analysis further extends the role of Chloroflexi in fundamental biogeochemical cycles. Environ. Res. 2022, 209, 112888. [Google Scholar]
18.
Lin L, Xu J. Dissecting and engineering metabolic and regulatory networks of thermophilic bacteria for biofuel production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 827–837. [Google Scholar]
19.
Zhu D, Adebisi WA, Ahmad F, Sethupathy S, Danso B, Sun J. Recent Development of Extremophilic Bacteria and Their Application in Biorefinery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 843. [Google Scholar]
20.
Zhai Y, Li X, Bai Y, Jin Z, Svensson B. Maltogenic α-amylase hydrolysis of wheat starch granules: Mechanism and relation to starch retrogradation. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107256. [Google Scholar]
21.
Febriani, Aura N, Kemala P, Saidi N, Iqbalsyah TM. Novel thermostable lipase produced by a thermo-halophilic bacterium that catalyses hydrolytic and transesterification reactions. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04520. [Google Scholar]
22.
Abro AA, Qureshi AS, Naqvi M, Khushk I, Jatt AN, Ali CH, et al. Lipase Production from alkalophilic-thermophilic-Ionic liquid tolerant Bacillus cereus using agricultural residues for its applications in biodiesel and detergents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 220, 119208. [Google Scholar]
23.
Mohammadi S, Pol A, van Alen TA, Jetten MSM, Op den Camp HJM. Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV, a thermoacidophilic ‘Knallgas’ methanotroph with both an oxygen-sensitive and -insensitive hydrogenase. ISME J. 2017, 11, 945–958. [Google Scholar]
24.
Pawar SS, van Niel EWJ. Thermophilic biohydrogen production: how far are we? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7999–8009. [Google Scholar]
25.
Morra S, Valetti F, Gilardi G. [FeFe]-hydrogenases as biocatalysts in bio-hydrogen production. Rend. Lincei 2017, 28, 183–194. [Google Scholar]
26.
Wang S, Lei H, Ji Z. Exploring Oxidoreductases from Extremophiles for Biosynthesis in a Non-Aqueous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6396. doi:10.3390/ijms24076396.[Google Scholar]
27.
Espina G, Atalah J, Blamey JM. Extremophilic Oxidoreductases for the Industry: Five Successful Examples with Promising Projections. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 710035. [Google Scholar]
28.
Artzi L, Bayer EA, Moraïs S. Cellulosomes: Bacterial nanomachines for dismantling plant polysaccharides. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 83–95. [Google Scholar]
29.
Guo Z-W, Ni Z-F, Zong M-H, Lou W-Y. Modular Metabolic Engineering of Bacillus licheniformis for Efficient 2,3-Butanediol Production by Consolidated Bioprocessing of Jerusalem Artichoke Tubers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 9624–9634. [Google Scholar]
30.
Saini N, Pal K, Sujata, Deepak B, Mona S. Thermophilic algae: A new prospect towards environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 324, 129277. [Google Scholar]
31.
Wang J, Yin Y. Progress in microbiology for fermentative hydrogen production from organic wastes. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 825–865. [Google Scholar]
32.
Woon JM, Khoo KS, Al-Zahrani AA, Alanazi MM, Lim JW, Cheng CK, et al. Epitomizing biohydrogen production from microbes: Critical challenges vs opportunities. Environ. Res. 2023, 227, 115780. [Google Scholar]
33.
Taleb MA, Gomaa SK, Wahba MI, Zaki RA, El-Fiky AF, El-Refai HA, et al. Bioscouring of wool fibres using immobilized thermophilic lipase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 194, 800–810. [Google Scholar]
34.
Peng Y, Ma L, Xu P, Tao F. High-Performance Production of N-Acetyl-d-Neuraminic Acid with Whole Cells of Fast-Growing Vibrio natriegens via a Thermal Strategy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 20198–20209. [Google Scholar]
35.
Li T, Chen X-B, Chen J-C, Wu Q, Chen G-Q. Open and continuous fermentation: Products, conditions and bioprocess economy. Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9, 1503–1511. [Google Scholar]
36.
Han X, Liu J, Wu Y, Yang Y, Tao F, Xu P. Activating a dormant metabolic pathway for high-temperature l-alanine production in Bacillus licheniformis. iScience 2023, 26, 106397. [Google Scholar]
37.
Ge Y, Li K, Li L, Gao C, Zhang L, Ma C, et al. Contracted but effective: production of enantiopure 2,3-butanediol by thermophilic and GRAS Bacillus licheniformis. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4693–4703. [Google Scholar]
38.
Lü C, Ge Y, Cao M, Guo X, Liu P, Gao C, et al. Metabolic Engineering of Bacillus licheniformis for Production of Acetoin. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 125. [Google Scholar]
39.
Li L, Li K, Wang K, Chen C, Gao C, Ma C, et al. Efficient production of 2,3-butanediol from corn stover hydrolysate by using a thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis strain. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 170, 256–261. [Google Scholar]
40.
Ohair J, Jin Q, Yu D, Wu J, Wang H, Zhou S, et al. Non-sterile fermentation of food waste using thermophilic and alkaliphilic Bacillus licheniformis YNP5-TSU for 2,3-butanediol production. Waste Manag. 2021, 120, 248–256. [Google Scholar]
41.
Liu J, Han X, Tao F, Xu P. Metabolic engineering of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for polymer-grade lactic acid production at high temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 393, 130164. [Google Scholar]
42.
Yang Z, Sun Q, Tan G, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Li C, et al. Engineering thermophilic Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for riboflavin production. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 363–373. [Google Scholar]
43.
Bu C-Y, Yan Y-X, Zou L-H, Zheng Z-J, Ouyang J. One-pot biosynthesis of furfuryl alcohol and lactic acid via a glucose coupled biphasic system using single Bacillus coagulans NL01. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123705. [Google Scholar]
44.
Sun W, Jiang B, Zhao D, Pu Z, Bao Y. Integration of metabolic pathway manipulation and promoter engineering for the fine-tuned biosynthesis of malic acid in Bacillus coagulans. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021, 118, 2597–2608. [Google Scholar]
45.
Tian X, Liu X, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Hang H, Chu J, et al. Metabolic engineering coupled with adaptive evolution strategies for the efficient production of high-quality L-lactic acid by Lactobacillus paracasei. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 323, 124549. [Google Scholar]
46.
Li Y, Hu J, Qu C, Chen L, Guo X, Fu H, et al. Engineered Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense with nfnAB knockout for improved hydrogen production from lignocellulose hydrolysates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 214. [Google Scholar]
47.
Yang X, Lai Z, Lai C, Zhu M, Li S, Wang J, et al. Efficient production of l-lactic acid by an engineered Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoensewith broad substrate specificity. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 124. [Google Scholar]
48.
Dai K, Qu C, Li X, Lan Y, Fu H, Wang J. Cofactor engineering in Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27 for maximizing ethanol yield and revealing an enzyme complex with high ferredoxin-NAD+ reductase activity. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 402, 130784. [Google Scholar]
49.
Dai K, Qu C, Feng J, Lan Y, Fu H, Wang J. Metabolic engineering of Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense strain SCUT27 for biofuels production from sucrose and molasses. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 155. [Google Scholar]
50.
Zhu M, Lu Y, Wang J, Li S, Wang X. Carbon Catabolite Repression and the Related Genes of ccpA, ptsH and hprK in Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142121. [Google Scholar]
51.
Qu C, Zhang Y, Dai K, Fu H, Wang J. Metabolic engineering of Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27 for glucose and cellobiose co-utilization by identification and overexpression of the endogenous cellobiose operon. Biochem. Eng. J. 2021, 167, 107922. [Google Scholar]
52.
Akinosho H, Yee K, Close D, Ragauskas A. The emergence of Clostridium thermocellum as a high utility candidate for consolidated bioprocessing applications. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 66. [Google Scholar]
53.
Lin PP, Mi L, Morioka AH, Yoshino KM, Konishi S, Xu SC, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulose to isobutanol using Clostridium thermocellum. Metab. Eng. 2015, 31, 44–52. [Google Scholar]
54.
Tian L, Conway PM, Cervenka ND, Cui J, Maloney M, Olson DG, et al. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium thermocellum for n-butanol production from cellulose. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 186. [Google Scholar]
55.
Seo H, Singh P, Wyman CE, Cai CM, Trinh CT. Rewiring metabolism of Clostridium thermocellum for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass poplar to produce short-chain esters. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 384, 129263. [Google Scholar]
56.
Xiong W, Reyes LH, Michener WE, Maness P-C, Chou KJ. Engineering cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum to co-ferment cellulose- and hemicellulose-derived sugars simultaneously. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 1755–1763. [Google Scholar]
57.
Singh B. Myceliophthora thermophila syn. Sporotrichum thermophile: A thermophilic mould of biotechnological potential. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
58.
Liu J, Chen M, Gu S, Fan R, Zhao Z, Sun W, et al. Independent metabolism of oligosaccharides is the keystone of synchronous utilization of cellulose and hemicellulose in Myceliophthora. PNAS Nexus 2024, 3, pgae053. [Google Scholar]
59.
Li J, Zhang Y, Li J, Sun T, Tian C. Metabolic engineering of the cellulolytic thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila to produce ethanol from cellobiose. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 23. [Google Scholar]
60.
Zhang Y, Sun T, Wu T, Li J, Hu D, Liu D, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production by metabolically engineered cellulolytic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila. Metab. Eng. 2023, 78, 192–199. [Google Scholar]
61.
Gu S, Li J, Chen B, Sun T, Liu Q, Xiao D, et al. Metabolic engineering of the thermophilic filamentous fungus Myceliophthora thermophila to produce fumaric acid. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 323. [Google Scholar]
62.
Li J, Lin L, Sun T, Xu J, Ji J, Liu Q, et al. Direct production of commodity chemicals from lignocellulose using Myceliophthora thermophila. Metab. Eng. 2020, 61, 416–426. [Google Scholar]
63.
Li J, Tseng J, Tang D, Yong Y, Sun L, Huo Y-X. Upcycling C1 gas-derived resources in future food system. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 210, 107827. [Google Scholar]
64.
Müller JEN, Heggeset TMB, Wendisch VF, Vorholt JA, Brautaset T. Methylotrophy in the thermophilic Bacillus methanolicus, basic insights and application for commodity production from methanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 535–551. [Google Scholar]
65.
Brautaset T, Jakobsen ØM, Degnes KF, Netzer R, Nærdal I, Krog A, et al. Bacillus methanolicus pyruvate carboxylase and homoserine dehydrogenase I and II and their roles for l-lysine production from methanol at 50 °C. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 951–964. [Google Scholar]
66.
Klein VJ, Brito LF, Perez-Garcia F, Brautaset T, Irla M. Metabolic engineering of thermophilic Bacillus methanolicus for riboflavin overproduction from methanol. Microb. Biotechnol. 2023, 16, 1011–1026. [Google Scholar]
67.
Holwerda EK, Olson DG, Ruppertsberger NM, Stevenson DM, Murphy SJL, Maloney MI, et al. Metabolic and evolutionary responses of Clostridium thermocellum to genetic interventions aimed at improving ethanol production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 40. [Google Scholar]
68.
Mazzoli R, Olson DG, Lynd LR. Construction of lactic acid overproducing Clostridium thermocellum through enhancement of lactate dehydrogenase expression. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 141, 109645. [Google Scholar]
69.
Zhang H, Han L, Dong H. An insight to pretreatment, enzyme adsorption and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: Experimental and modeling studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 140, 110758. [Google Scholar]
70.
Wang M, Han J, Dunn JB, Cai H, Elgowainy A. Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 045905. [Google Scholar]
71.
Hamann PRV, Noronha EF. Xylan-breakdown apparatus of Clostridium thermocellum. Cellulose 2022, 29, 7535–7553. [Google Scholar]
72.
Argyros DA, Tripathi Shital A, Barrett Trisha F, Rogers Stephen R, Feinberg Lawrence F, Olson Daniel G, et al. High Ethanol Titers from Cellulose by Using Metabolically Engineered Thermophilic, Anaerobic Microbes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 8288–8294. [Google Scholar]
73.
Jiang Y, Jiang W, Xin F, Zhang W, Jiang M. Thermophiles: Potential chassis for lignocellulosic biorefinery. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 643–646. [Google Scholar]
74.
Kiyoshi K, Furukawa M, Seyama T, Kadokura T, Nakazato A, Nakayama S. Butanol production from alkali-pretreated rice straw by co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186, 325–328. [Google Scholar]
75.
Lu J, Lv Y, Jiang Y, Wu M, Xu B, Zhang W, et al. Consolidated Bioprocessing of Hemicellulose-Enriched Lignocellulose to Succinic Acid through a Microbial Cocultivation System. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 9035–9045. [Google Scholar]
76.
Pason P, Tachaapaikoon C, Panichnumsin P, Ketbot P, Waeonukul R, Kosugi A, et al. One-step biohydrogen production from cassava pulp using novel enrichment of anaerobic thermophilic bacteria community. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 27, 101658. [Google Scholar]
77.
de Vrije T, Bakker RR, Budde MAW, Lai MH, Mars AE, Claassen PAM. Efficient hydrogen production from the lignocellulosic energy crop Miscanthus by the extreme thermophilic bacteria Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga neapolitana. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2, 12. [Google Scholar]
78.
Jiang Y, Lu J, Lv Y, Wu R, Dong W, Zhou J, et al. Efficient hydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstocks by a newly isolated thermophlic Thermoanaerobacterium sp. strain F6. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 14380–14386. [Google Scholar]
79.
Rodge SP, Shende KS, Patil NP. Polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis and optimisation of thermophilic Geobacillus stearothermophilus strain K4E3_SPR_NPP. Extremophiles 2023, 27, 13. [Google Scholar]
80.
James-Pearson LF, Dudley KJ, Te’o VSJ, Patel BKC. A hot topic: Thermophilic plastic biodegradation. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar]
81.
An J, Ha B, Lee SK. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by the thermophile Cupriavidus cauae PHS1. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 371, 128627. [Google Scholar]
82.
Pernicova I, Novackova I, Sedlacek P, Kourilova X, Kalina M, Kovalcik A, et al. Introducing the Newly Isolated Bacterium Aneurinibacillus sp. H1 as an Auspicious Thermophilic Producer of Various Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Copolymers–1. Isolation and Characterization of the Bacterium. Polymers 2020, 12, 1235. [Google Scholar]
83.
Svetlitchnyi VA, Svetlichnaya TP, Falkenhan DA, Swinnen S, Knopp D, Läufer A. Direct conversion of cellulose to l-lactic acid by a novel thermophilic Caldicellulosiruptor strain. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2022, 15, 44. [Google Scholar]
84.
Aulitto M, Alfano A, Maresca E, Avolio R, Errico ME, Gentile G, et al. Thermophilic biocatalysts for one-step conversion of citrus waste into lactic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 155. [Google Scholar]
85.
Aulitto M, Fusco S, Bartolucci S, Franzén CJ, Contursi P. Bacillus coagulans MA-13: A promising thermophilic and cellulolytic strain for the production of lactic acid from lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 210. [Google Scholar]
86.
Ma Y, Gao Z, Wang Q, Liu Y. Biodiesels from microbial oils: Opportunity and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 263, 631–641. [Google Scholar]
87.
Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294–306. [Google Scholar]
88.
Gilmour DJ. Chapter OneMicroalgae for biofuel production. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Gadd GM, Sariaslani S, Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2019; p. 1–30.
89.
D’Alessandro EB, Soares AT, Pereira J, Antoniosi Filho NR. Viability of biodiesel production from a thermophilic microalga in conventional and alternative culture media. Rev. Bras. de Bot. 2018, 41, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
90.
Zili F, Mezhoud N, Trabelsi L, Chreif I, Ben Ouada H. Fatty acid composition of the thermophilic Gloeocapsa gelatinosa under different combinations of temperature, light intensity, and NaNO3 concentration. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
91.
Li T, Zheng Y, Yu L, Chen S. High productivity cultivation of a heat-resistant microalga Chlorella sorokiniana for biofuel production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
92.
Atanasova N, Stoitsova S, Paunova-Krasteva T, Kambourova M. Plastic Degradation by Extremophilic Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5610. [Google Scholar]
93.
Atanasova N, Paunova-Krasteva T, Stoitsova S, Radchenkova N, Boyadzhieva I, Petrov K, et al. Degradation of Poly(ε-caprolactone) by a Thermophilic Community and Brevibacillus thermoruber Strain 7 Isolated from Bulgarian Hot Spring. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1488. [Google Scholar]
94.
Chua T-K, Tseng M, Yang M-K. Degradation of Poly(ε-caprolactone) by thermophilic Streptomyces thermoviolaceus subsp. thermoviolaceus 76T-2. AMB Express 2013, 3, 8. [Google Scholar]
95.
Yan F, Wei R, Cui Q, Bornscheuer UT, Liu Y-J. Thermophilic whole-cell degradation of polyethylene terephthalate using engineered Clostridium thermocellum. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 374–385. [Google Scholar]
96.
Tomita K, Hayashi N, Ikeda N, Kikuchi Y. Isolation of a thermophilic bacterium degrading some nylons. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 81, 511–514. [Google Scholar]
97.
Wollmann F, Dietze S, Ackermann J-U, Bley T, Walther T, Steingroewer J, et al. Microalgae wastewater treatment: Biological and technological approaches. Eng. Life Sci. 2019, 19, 860–871. [Google Scholar]
98.
Al-rasheedi S, Tawabini B, Nazal M, Khalil A. Application of Thermophilic Bacteria for the Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 47, 6881–6888. [Google Scholar]
99.
Selvaratnam T, Pegallapati AK, Montelya F, Rodriguez G, Nirmalakhandan N, Van Voorhies W, et al. Evaluation of a thermo-tolerant acidophilic alga, Galdieria sulphuraria, for nutrient removal from urban wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 156, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
100.
Sloth JK, Jensen HC, Pleissner D, Eriksen NT. Growth and phycocyanin synthesis in the heterotrophic microalga Galdieria sulphuraria on substrates made of food waste from restaurants and bakeries. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 238, 296–305. [Google Scholar]
101.
Henkanatte-Gedera SM, Selvaratnam T, Karbakhshravari M, Myint M, Nirmalakhandan N, Van Voorhies W, et al. Removal of dissolved organic carbon and nutrients from urban wastewaters by Galdieria sulphuraria: Laboratory to field scale demonstration. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 450–456. [Google Scholar]
102.
Delanka-Pedige HMK, Munasinghe-Arachchige SP, Cornelius J, Henkanatte-Gedera SM, Tchinda D, Zhang Y, et al. Pathogen reduction in an algal-based wastewater treatment system employing Galdieria sulphuraria. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101423. [Google Scholar]
103.
Mohanty SS, Mohanty K. Valorization of Chlorella thermophila biomass cultivated in dairy wastewater for biopesticide production against bacterial rice blight: a circular biorefinery approach. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 644. [Google Scholar]
104.
Padri M, Boontian N, Teaumroong N, Piromyou P, Piasai C. Co-culture of microalga Chlorella sorokiniana with syntrophic Streptomyces thermocarboxydus in cassava wastewater for wastewater treatment and biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126732. [Google Scholar]
105.
Pradhan D, Sukla LB, Sawyer M, Rahman PKSM. Recent bioreduction of hexavalent chromium in wastewater treatment: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 55, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
106.
Kulkarni S, Ballal A, Apte SK. Bioprecipitation of uranium from alkaline waste solutions using recombinant Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 853–861. [Google Scholar]
107.
Donati ER, Castro C, Urbieta MS. Thermophilic microorganisms in biomining. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 179. [Google Scholar]
108.
Xia M-C, Wang Y-P, Peng T-J, Shen L, Yu R-L, Liu Y-D, et al. Recycling of metals from pretreated waste printed circuit boards effectively in stirred tank reactor by a moderately thermophilic culture. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 714–721. [Google Scholar]
109.
Gan M, Jie S, Li M, Zhu J, Liu X. Bioleaching of multiple metals from contaminated sediment by moderate thermophiles. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 97, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
110.
Brock TD. Life at High Temperatures. Science 1985, 230, 132–138. [Google Scholar]
111.
Scoma A, Garrido-Amador P, Nielsen Søren D, Røy H, Kjeldsen Kasper U. The Polyextremophilic Bacterium Clostridium paradoxum Attains Piezophilic Traits by Modulating Its Energy Metabolism and Cell Membrane Composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00802-19. [Google Scholar]
112.
Imanaka T. Molecular bases of thermophily in hyperthermophiles. Proc. Jpn.Acad. Ser. B 2011, 87, 587–602. [Google Scholar]
113.
Ishino Y, Narumi I. DNA repair in hyperthermophilic and hyperradioresistant microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 25, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
114.
Jolly SM, Gainetdinov I, Jouravleva K, Zhang H, Strittmatter L, Bailey SM, et al. Thermus thermophilus Argonaute Functions in the Completion of DNA Replication. Cell 2020, 182, 1545–1559.e18. [Google Scholar]
115.
Shu W-S, Huang L-N. Microbial diversity in extreme environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 219–235. [Google Scholar]
116.
Takemata N. How Do Thermophiles Organize Their Genomes? Microbes Environ. 2024, 39, ME23087. [Google Scholar]
117.
Dubrez L, Causse S, Borges Bonan N, Dumétier B, Garrido C. Heat-shock proteins: chaperoning DNA repair. Oncogene 2020, 39, 516–529. [Google Scholar]
118.
Dong Z, Chen X, Cai K, Shen P, Tian K, Jin P, et al. Overexpression of the Bacillus licheniformis GroES enhances thermotolerance of Bacillus subtilis WB600. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018, 32, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar]
119.
Hofman-Bang J, Lange M, Conway de Macario E, Macario AJL, Ahring BK. The genes coding for the hsp70(dnaK) molecular chaperone machine occur in the moderate thermophilic archaeon Methanosarcina thermophila TM-1. Gene 1999, 238, 387–395. [Google Scholar]
120.
Jin J, Li Y, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Guo J, Wan F. Heat Shock Factor Is Involved in Regulating the Transcriptional Expression of Two Potential Hsps (AhHsp70 and AhsHsp21) and Its Role in Heat Shock Response of Agasicles hygrophila. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 562204. [Google Scholar]
121.
Roncarati D, Scarlato V. Regulation of heat-shock genes in bacteria: from signal sensing to gene expression output. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 549–574. [Google Scholar]
122.
Zeldes BM, Straub CT, Otten JK, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. A synthetic enzymatic pathway for extremely thermophilic acetone production based on the unexpectedly thermostable acetoacetate decarboxylase from Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 2951–2961. [Google Scholar]
123.
Hendrikse NM, Charpentier G, Nordling E, Syrén P-O. Ancestral diterpene cyclases show increased thermostability and substrate acceptance. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 4660–4673. [Google Scholar]
124.
Vieille C, Zeikus Gregory J. Hyperthermophilic Enzymes: Sources, Uses, and Molecular Mechanisms for Thermostability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2001, 65, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
125.
Turner P, Mamo G, Karlsson EN. Potential and utilization of thermophiles and thermostable enzymes in biorefining. Microb. Cell Fact. 2007, 6, 9. [Google Scholar]
126.
Borhani S, Arab SS. Investigation of thermal stability characteristic in family A DNA polymeraseA theoretical study. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2023, 182, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
127.
Pack SP, Kang TJ, Yoo YJ. Protein Thermostabilizing Factors: High Relative Occurrence of Amino Acids, Residual Properties, and Secondary Structure Type in Different Residual State. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 1212–1226. [Google Scholar]
128.
Modarres HP, Mofrad MR, Sanati-Nezhad A. Protein thermostability engineering. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 115252–115270. [Google Scholar]
129.
Seychell BC, Beck T. Molecular basis for protein–protein interactions. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
130.
Mundlapati VR, Sahoo DK, Bhaumik S, Jena S, Chandrakar A, Biswal HS. Noncovalent Carbon-Bonding Interactions in Proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16496–16500. [Google Scholar]
131.
Liu Z, Lemmonds S, Huang J, Tyagi M, Hong L, Jain N. Entropic contribution to enhanced thermal stability in the thermostable P450 CYP119. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E10049–E10058. [Google Scholar]
132.
Camilloni C, Bonetti D, Morrone A, Giri R, Dobson CM, Brunori M, et al. Towards a structural biology of the hydrophobic effect in protein folding. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28285. [Google Scholar]
133.
Li J, Hou C, Ma X, Guo S, Zhang H, Shi L, et al. Entropy-Enthalpy Compensations Fold Proteins in Precise Ways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9653. [Google Scholar]
134.
Matsumura M, Signor G, Matthews BW. Substantial increase of protein stability by multiple disulphide bonds. Nature 1989, 342, 291–293. [Google Scholar]
135.
Pu M, Xu Z, Peng Y, Hou Y, Liu D, Wang Y, et al. Protein crystal quality oriented disulfide bond engineering. Protein Cell 2018, 9, 659–663. [Google Scholar]
136.
Karshikoff A, Nilsson L, Ladenstein R. Rigidity versus flexibility: The dilemma of understanding protein thermal stability. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 3899–3917. [Google Scholar]
137.
Yu H, Yan Y, Zhang C, Dalby PA. Two strategies to engineer flexible loops for improved enzyme thermostability. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41212. [Google Scholar]
138.
Xu Z, Cen Y-K, Zou S-P, Xue Y-P, Zheng Y-G. Recent advances in the improvement of enzyme thermostability by structure modification. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
139.
Yang W, Yang Y, Zhang L, Xu H, Guo X, Yang X, et al. Improved thermostability of an acidic xylanase from Aspergillus sulphureus by combined disulphide bridge introduction and proline residue substitution. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1587. [Google Scholar]
140.
Zou J, Song B, Simmerling C, Raleigh D. Experimental and Computational Analysis of Protein Stabilization by Gly-to-d-Ala Substitution: A Convolution of Native State and Unfolded State Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15682–15689. [Google Scholar]
141.
Charoenwongpaiboon T, Sommanat N, Wangpaiboon K, Puangpathanachai M, Pongsawasdi P, Pichyangkura R. Improving the thermostability and modulating the inulin profile of inulosucrase through rational glycine-to-proline substitution. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 2346–2353. [Google Scholar]
142.
Jiang F, Bian J, Liu H, Li S, Bai X, Zheng L, et al. Creatinase: Using Increased Entropy to Improve the Activity and Thermostability. J. Phys. Chem. B 2023, 127, 2671–2682. [Google Scholar]
143.
Ferreira PHB, Freitas FC, McCully ME, Slade GG, de Oliveira RJ. The Role of Electrostatics and Folding Kinetics on the Thermostability of Homologous Cold Shock Proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020, 60, 546–561. [Google Scholar]
144.
Khan S, Farooq U, Kurnikova M. Exploring Protein Stability by Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Homologous Hyperthermophilic, Mesophilic, and Psychrophilic Proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 2129–2139. [Google Scholar]
145.
Gómez-Calvo A, Gallardo ME, Ladero M. Lipozyme® TL IM Biocatalyst for Castor Oil FAME and Triacetin Production by Interesterification: Activity, Stability, and Kinetics. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1673. [Google Scholar]
146.
Janusz G, Pawlik A, Świderska-Burek U, Polak J, Sulej J, Jarosz-Wilkołazka A, et al. Laccase Properties, Physiological Functions, and Evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 966. [Google Scholar]
147.
Ayubi MM, Werner A, Steudler S, Haase S, Lange R, Walther T, et al. Enhanced xylan conversion to xylitol in a bio- and chemocatalytic one-pot process. Catal. Today 2021, 367, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
148.
Rabbani G, Ahmad E, Ahmad A, Khan RH. Structural features, temperature adaptation and industrial applications of microbial lipases from psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic origins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 822–839. [Google Scholar]
149.
Cai J, Xie Y, Song B, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Feng Y. Fervidobacterium changbaicum Lip1: identification, cloning, and characterization of the thermophilic lipase as a new member of bacterial lipase family V. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar]
150.
Yang W, Vethanayagam RR, Dong Y, Cai Q, Hu BH.  Activation of the antigen presentation function of mononuclear phagocyte populations associated with the basilar membrane of the cochlea after acoustic overstimulation. Neuroscience 2015, 303, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
151.
Salameh MA, Wiegel J. Purification and characterization of two highly thermophilic alkaline lipases from Thermosyntropha lipolytica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7725–7731. [Google Scholar]
152.
Mathew GM, Madhavan A, Arun KB, Sindhu R, Binod P, Singhania RR, et al. Thermophilic Chitinases: Structural, Functional and Engineering Attributes for Industrial Applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 142–164. [Google Scholar]
153.
Toharisman A, Suhartono MT, Spindler-Barth M, Hwang J-K, Pyun Y-R. Purification and characterization of a thermostable chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis Mb-2. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 733–738. [Google Scholar]
154.
Juturu V, Wu JC. Microbial cellulases: Engineering, production and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 188–203. [Google Scholar]
155.
Shad M, Rehman HM, Akhtar MW, Sajjad M. Structural and functional insights of starch processing α-amylase from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi. Carbohydr. Res. 2024, 539, 109122. [Google Scholar]
156.
Chien A, Edgar DB, Trela JM. Deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase from the extreme thermophile Thermus aquaticus. J. Bacteriol. 1976, 127, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar]
157.
Kwon K-M, Kang SG, Sokolova TG, Cho SS, Kim YJ, Kim C-H, et al. Characterization of a family B DNA polymerase from Thermococcus barophilus Ch5 and its application for long and accurate PCR. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2016, 86, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
158.
Yamashita M, Xu J, Morokuma D, Hirata K, Hino M, Mon H, et al. Characterization of Recombinant Thermococcus kodakaraensis (KOD) DNA Polymerases Produced Using Silkworm-Baculovirus Expression Vector System. Mol. Biotechnol. 2017, 59, 221–233. [Google Scholar]
159.
Chambers CR, Patrick WM. Archaeal Nucleic Acid Ligases and Their Potential in Biotechnology. Archaea 2015, 2015, 170571. [Google Scholar]
160.
Pezeshgi Modarres H, Dorokhov BD, Popov VO, Ravin NV, Skryabin KG, Dal Peraro M. Understanding and Engineering Thermostability in DNA Ligase from Thermococcus sp. 1519. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 3076–3085. [Google Scholar]
161.
Seo MS, Kim YJ, Choi JJ, Lee MS, Kim JH, Lee J-H, et al. Cloning and expression of a DNA ligase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Staphylothermus marinus and properties of the enzyme. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 519–530. [Google Scholar]
162.
Berezina OV, Herlet J, Rykov SV, Kornberger P, Zavyalov A, Kozlov D, et al. Thermostable multifunctional GH74 xyloglucanase from Myceliophthora thermophila: High-level expression in Pichia pastoris and characterization of the recombinant protein. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 5653–5666. [Google Scholar]
163.
Kengen SWM, Luesink EJ, Stams AJM, Zehnder AJB. Purification and characterization of an extremely thermostable β-glucosidase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 213, 305–312. [Google Scholar]
164.
Flores-Fernández CN, Cárdenas-Fernández M, Lye GJ, Ward JM. Synergistic action of thermophilic pectinases for pectin bioconversion into D-galacturonic acid. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2022, 160, 110071. [Google Scholar]
165.
Gu X, Lu H, Chen W, Meng X. Characterization of a Novel Thermophilic Mannanase and Synergistic Hydrolysis of Galactomannan Combined with Swollenin. Catalysts 2021, 11, 254. [Google Scholar]
166.
Brunecky R, Donohoe BS, Yarbrough JM, Mittal A, Scott BR, Ding H, et al. The Multi Domain Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA Cellulase Excels at the Hydrolysis of Crystalline Cellulose. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9622. [Google Scholar]
167.
Abol-Fotouh D, AlHagar OEA, Hassan MA. Optimization, purification, and biochemical characterization of thermoalkaliphilic lipase from a novel Geobacillus stearothermophilus FMR12 for detergent formulations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 125–135. [Google Scholar]
168.
Buzzo Bárbara B, Lima Natália Sarmanho M, Pereira Pâmela Aparecida M, Gomes-Pepe Elisângela S, Sartini Camila Cesario F, Lemos Eliana Gertrudes de M.  Lignin degradation by a novel thermophilic and alkaline yellow laccase from Chitinophaga sp. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e04013-23. [Google Scholar]
169.
Wayllace NM, Hedín N, Busi MV, Gomez-Casati DF. Identification, molecular and biochemical characterization of a novel thermoactive and thermostable glucoamylase from Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Biotechnol. Lett. 2022, 44, 1201–1216. [Google Scholar]
170.
Xu Y, Xuan X, Gao R, Xie G. Increased Expression Levels of Thermophilic Serine Protease TTHA0724 through Signal Peptide Screening in Bacillus subtilis and Applications of the Enzyme. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15950. [Google Scholar]
171.
Curci N, Strazzulli A, De Lise F, Iacono R, Maurelli L, Dal Piaz F, et al. Identification of a novel esterase from the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 407–419. [Google Scholar]
172.
Yang W, He Y, Xu L, Zhang H, Yan Y. A new extracellular thermo-solvent-stable lipase from Burkholderia ubonensis SL-4: Identification, characterization and application for biodiesel production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 126, 76–89. [Google Scholar]
173.
Xu Y, OuYang B, Deng L, Liao M, Tang T, Lan D, et al. Biochemical characterization of a novel hyperthermophilic chitinase from a deep-sea Thermotogae bacterium. Process Biochem. 2024, 143, 60–72. [Google Scholar]
174.
Li W, Shi H, Ding H, Wang L, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. Characterization of two novel thermostable esterases from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum. Protein Expression Purif. 2018, 152, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
175.
Sharma N, Leung IKH. Novel Thermophilic Bacterial Laccase for the Degradation of Aromatic Organic Pollutants. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 711345. [Google Scholar]
176.
Lv C, Gu T, Ma R, Yao W, Huang Y, Gu J, et al. Biochemical characterization of a GH19 chitinase from Streptomyces alfalfae and its applications in crystalline chitin conversion and biocontrol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
177.
Saghatelyan A, Panosyan H, Trchounian A, Birkeland N-K. Characteristics of DNA polymerase I from an extreme thermophile, Thermus scotoductus strain K1. MicrobiologyOpen 2021, 10, e1149. [Google Scholar]
178.
Madavi TB, Chauhan S, Keshri A, Alavilli H, Choi K-Y, Pamidimarri SDVN. Whole-cell biocatalysis: Advancements toward the biosynthesis of fuels. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2022, 16, 859–876. [Google Scholar]
179.
Ninh Pham H, Honda K, Yokohigashi Y, Okano K, Omasa T, Ohtake H. Development of a Continuous Bioconversion System Using a Thermophilic Whole-Cell Biocatalyst. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1996–2001. [Google Scholar]
180.
Schwarz FM, Müller V. Whole-cell biocatalysis for hydrogen storage and syngas conversion to formate using a thermophilic acetogen. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 32. [Google Scholar]
181.
Adachi D, Koh F, Hama S, Ogino C, Kondo A. A robust whole-cell biocatalyst that introduces a thermo- and solvent-tolerant lipase into Aspergillus oryzae cells: Characterization and application to enzymatic biodiesel production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2013, 52, 331–335. [Google Scholar]
182.
Li Q, Li G, Ma F, Zhang Z, Zheng B, Feng Y. Highly efficient ring-opening polymerization of ɛ-caprolactone catalyzed by a recombinant Escherichia coli whole-cell biocatalyst. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 477–481. [Google Scholar]
183.
Wei B, Kang Y, Zhao Y, Xu H, Liang H. Rational Design of Spontaneous Self-Cyclization Enzymes In Vivo and In Vitro with Improved Thermal Tolerance and Activity. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 5469–5480. [Google Scholar]
184.
Straub CT, Zeldes BM, Schut GJ, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. Extremely thermophilic energy metabolisms: biotechnological prospects. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 104–112. [Google Scholar]
185.
Cea PA, Pérez M, Herrera SM, Muñoz SM, Fuentes-Ugarte N, Coche-Miranda J, et al. Deciphering Structural Traits for Thermal and Kinetic Stability across Protein Family Evolution through Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae127. [Google Scholar]
186.
Wu Y, Liu J, Han X, Meng X, Li M, Wang J, et al. Eliminating host-guest incompatibility via enzyme mining enables the high-temperature production of N-acetylglucosamine. iScience 2023, 26, 105774. [Google Scholar]
187.
Li X, Gui P, Yang R, Lu Z, Wang X, Luo C, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel thermostable transaminase (TATP) from Thermorudis peleae. Biocatal. Biotransform 2024, 42, 378–387. [Google Scholar]
188.
Dong Y-Q, Shen J-D, Pan L, Huang J-H, Liu Z-Q, Zheng Y-G. Mining and Characterization of Thermophilic Glucose Isomerase Based on Virtual Probe Technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 195, 4399–4413. [Google Scholar]
189.
Chen J, Ni D, Zhu Y, Xu W, Moussa TAA, Zhang W, et al. Discovery of a Thermostable Tagatose 4-Epimerase Powered by Structure- and Sequence-Based Protein Clustering. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 18585–18593. [Google Scholar]
190.
Qi H, Wang T, Li H, Li C, Guan L, Liu W, et al. Sequence- and Structure-Based Mining of Thermostable D-Allulose 3-Epimerase and Computer-Guided Protein Engineering to Improve Enzyme Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 18431–18442. [Google Scholar]
191.
Olalla L-L, Maria EC, Maria IGS.  New Extremophilic Lipases and Esterases from Metagenomics. Curr. Protein Peptide Sci. 2014, 15, 445–455. [Google Scholar]
192.
Ariaeenejad S, Gharechahi J, Foroozandeh Shahraki M, Fallah Atanaki F, Han J-L, Ding X-Z, et al. Precision enzyme discovery through targeted mining of metagenomic data. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2024, 14, 7. [Google Scholar]
193.
DeCastro M-E, Rodríguez-Belmonte E, González-Siso M-I. Metagenomics of Thermophiles with a Focus on Discovery of Novel Thermozymes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1521. [Google Scholar]
194.
Shahraki MF, Atanaki FF, Ariaeenejad S, Ghaffari MR, Norouzi-Beirami MH, Maleki M, et al. A computational learning paradigm to targeted discovery of biocatalysts from metagenomic data: A case study of lipase identification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2022, 119, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar]
195.
Sonnendecker C, Oeser J, Richter PK, Hille P, Zhao Z, Fischer C, et al. Low Carbon Footprint Recycling of Post-Consumer PET Plastic with a Metagenomic Polyester Hydrolase. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202101062. [Google Scholar]
196.
Sun B, Zhao X, Xu B, Su E, Kovalevsky A, Shen Q, et al. Discovering and Designing a Chimeric Hyperthermophilic Chitinase for Crystalline Chitin Degradation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 4690–4698. [Google Scholar]
197.
Li G, Rabe KS, Nielsen J, Engqvist MKM. Machine Learning Applied to Predicting Microorganism Growth Temperatures and Enzyme Catalytic Optima. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 1411–1420. [Google Scholar]
198.
Gado JE, Beckham GT, Payne CM. Improving Enzyme Optimum Temperature Prediction with Resampling Strategies and Ensemble Learning. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020, 60, 4098–4107. [Google Scholar]
199.
Zhang Y, Guan F, Xu G, Liu X, Zhang Y, Sun J, et al. A novel thermophilic chitinase directly mined from the marine metagenome using the deep learning tool Preoptem. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2022, 9, 54. [Google Scholar]
200.
Sun J, Zhu T, Cui Y, Wu B. Structure-based self-supervised learning enables ultrafast prediction of stability changes upon mutation at the protein universe scale. bioRxiv 2023. doi:10.1101/2023.08.09.552725.
201.
Delgado J, Radusky LG, Cianferoni D, Serrano L. FoldX 5.0: Working with RNA, small molecules and a new graphical interface. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4168–4169. [Google Scholar]
202.
Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R, et al. Chapter nineteenRosetta3: An Object-Oriented Software Suite for the Simulation and Design of Macromolecules. In Methods Enzymol; Johnson ML, Brand L, Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 545–574.
203.
Musil M, Jezik A, Horackova J, Borko S, Kabourek P, Damborsky J, et al. FireProt 2.0: Web-based platform for the fully automated design of thermostable proteins. Brief. Bioinform. 2024, 25, bbad425. [Google Scholar]
204.
Jung F, Frey K, Zimmer D, Mühlhaus T. DeepSTABp: A Deep Learning Approach for the Prediction of Thermal Protein Stability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7444. [Google Scholar]
205.
Wang S, Tang H, Zhao Y, Zuo L. BayeStab: Predicting effects of mutations on protein stability with uncertainty quantification. Protein Sci. 2022, 31, e4467. [Google Scholar]
206.
Xu Y, Liu D, Gong H. Improving the prediction of protein stability changes upon mutations by geometric learning and a pre-training strategy. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2024, 4, 840–850. [Google Scholar]
207.
Sumbalova L, Stourac J, Martinek T, Bednar D, Damborsky J. HotSpot Wizard 3.0: Web server for automated design of mutations and smart libraries based on sequence input information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W356–W362. [Google Scholar]
208.
Nikam R, Kulandaisamy A, Harini K, Sharma D, Gromiha MM. ProThermDB: thermodynamic database for proteins and mutants revisited after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D420–D424. [Google Scholar]
209.
Jeske L, Placzek S, Schomburg I, Chang A, Schomburg D. BRENDA in 2019: A European ELIXIR core data resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D542–D549. [Google Scholar]
210.
Xavier JS, Nguyen T-B, Karmarkar M, Portelli S, Rezende PM, Velloso JPL, et al.  ThermoMutDB: A thermodynamic database for missense mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D475–D479. [Google Scholar]
211.
Wang Y, Xue P, Cao M, Yu T, Lane ST, Zhao H. Directed Evolution: Methodologies and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 12384–12444. [Google Scholar]
212.
Tobin MB, Gustafsson C, Huisman GW. Directed evolution: the ‘rational’ basis for ‘irrational’ design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
213.
Chowdhury R, Maranas CD. From directed evolution to computational enzyme engineeringA review. AICHE J. 2020, 66, e16847. [Google Scholar]
214.
Li C, Zhang W, Wei C, Gao X, Mao S, Lu F, et al. Continuous Spectrophotometric Assay for High-Throughput Screening of Predominant d-Allulose 3-Epimerases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 11637–11645. [Google Scholar]
215.
Shi L, Liu P, Tan Z, Zhao W, Gao J, Gu Q, et al. Complete Depolymerization of PET Wastes by an Evolved PET Hydrolase from Directed Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202218390. [Google Scholar]
216.
Zhou W, Huang R, Zhu Z, Zhang Yi-Heng PJ. Coevolution of both Thermostability and Activity of Polyphosphate Glucokinase from Thermobifida fusca YX. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01224-18. [Google Scholar]
217.
Xiong Z, Tian X, Wang G, Song X, Xia Y, Zhang H, et al. Development of a high-throughput screening method for exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus based on Congo red. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 112094. [Google Scholar]
218.
Li M, Chen Z, Huo Y-X. Application Evaluation and Performance-Directed Improvement of the Native and Engineered Biosensors. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 5002–5024. [Google Scholar]
219.
Mannan AA, Liu D, Zhang F, Oyarzún DA. Fundamental Design Principles for Transcription-Factor-Based Metabolite Biosensors. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 1851–1859. [Google Scholar]
220.
Reyes-De-Corcuera JI, Olstad HE, García-Torres R. Stability and Stabilization of Enzyme Biosensors: The Key to Successful Application and Commercialization. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 293–322. [Google Scholar]
221.
Li Z, Hu Y, Yu C, Fei K, Shen L, Liu Y, et al. Semi-rational engineering of D-allulose 3-epimerase for simultaneously improving the catalytic activity and thermostability based on D-allulose biosensor. Biotechnol. J. 2024, 19, 2400280. [Google Scholar]
222.
Li C, Gao X, Li H, Wang T, Lu F, Qin H-M. Growth-Coupled Evolutionary Pressure Improving Epimerases for D-Allulose Biosynthesis Using a Biosensor-Assisted In Vivo Selection Platform. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2306478. [Google Scholar]
223.
Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 102–107. [Google Scholar]
224.
Mo H-M, Xu Y, Yu X-W. Improved Soluble Expression and Catalytic Activity of a Thermostable Esterase Using a High-Throughput Screening System Based on a Split-GFP Assembly. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12756–12764. [Google Scholar]
225.
Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 630, 493–500. [Google Scholar]
226.
Jumper J, Hassabis D. Protein structure predictions to atomic accuracy with AlphaFold. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
227.
Peccati F, Alunno-Rufini S, Jiménez-Osés G. Accurate Prediction of Enzyme Thermostabilization with Rosetta Using AlphaFold Ensembles. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63, 898–909. [Google Scholar]
228.
Wang Z-K, Feng D-T, Su C, Li H, Rao Z-M, Rao Y-J, et al. Designing ASSMD Strategy for Exploring and Engineering Extreme Thermophilic Ancestral Nitrilase for Nitriles Biocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 13825–13838. [Google Scholar]
229.
Graff DE, Shakhnovich EI, Coley CW. Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learning. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 7866–7881. [Google Scholar]
230.
Foroozandeh Shahraki M, Ariaeenejad S, Fallah Atanaki F, Zolfaghari B, Koshiba T, Kavousi K, et al. MCIC: Automated Identification of Cellulases from Metagenomic Data and Characterization Based on Temperature and pH Dependence. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 567863. [Google Scholar]
231.
Xi Y, Ye L, Yu H. Enhanced thermal and alkaline stability of L-lysine decarboxylase CadA by combining directed evolution and computation-guided virtual screening. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2022, 9, 24. [Google Scholar]
232.
Li Y, Fu Y, Chen X, Fan S, Cao Z, Xu F. A Dual-Focus Workflow for Simultaneously Engineering High Activity and Thermal Stability in Methyl Parathion Hydrolase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 136, e202410881. [Google Scholar]
233.
Xu S-Y, Chu R-L, Liu H-T, Weng C-Y, Wang Y-J, Zheng Y-G. Computer-directed rational design enhanced the thermostability of carbonyl reductase LsCR for the synthesis of ticagrelor precursor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2024, 121, 1532–1542. [Google Scholar]
234.
Xian-Fang W, Peng G, Yi-Feng L, Hong-Fei L, Fan L. Predicting Thermophilic Proteins by Machine Learning. Curr. Bioinform. 2020, 15, 493–502. [Google Scholar]
235.
Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, Jones DT. A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 40–55. [Google Scholar]
236.
Yang KK, Wu Z, Arnold FH. Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 687–694. [Google Scholar]
237.
Kouba P, Kohout P, Haddadi F, Bushuiev A, Samusevich R, Sedlar J, et al. Machine Learning-Guided Protein Engineering. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 13863–13895. [Google Scholar]
238.
Zhang Z, Li Z, Yang M, Zhao F, Han S. Machine learning-guided multi-site combinatorial mutagenesis enhances the thermostability of pectin lyase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134530. [Google Scholar]
239.
Yoshida K, Kawai S, Fujitani M, Koikeda S, Kato R, Ema T. Enhancement of protein thermostability by three consecutive mutations using loop-walking method and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11883. [Google Scholar]
240.
Khakzad H, Igashov I, Schneuing A, Goverde C, Bronstein M, Correia B. A new age in protein design empowered by deep learning. Cell Syst. 2023, 14, 925–939. [Google Scholar]
241.
Shroff R, Cole AW, Diaz DJ, Morrow BR, Donnell I, Annapareddy A, et al. Discovery of Novel Gain-of-Function Mutations Guided by Structure-Based Deep Learning. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 2927–2935. [Google Scholar]
242.
Lu H, Diaz DJ, Czarnecki NJ, Zhu C, Kim W, Shroff R, et al. Machine learning-aided engineering of hydrolases for PET depolymerization. Nature 2022, 604, 662–667. [Google Scholar]
243.
Fang X, Huang J, Zhang R, Wang F, Zhang Q, Li G, et al. Convolution Neural Network-Based Prediction of Protein Thermostability. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 4833–4843. [Google Scholar]
244.
Liao M, Feng S, Liu X, Xu G, Li S, Bai Y, et al. Novel Insights into Enzymatic Thermostability: The “Short Board” Theory and Zero-Shot Hamiltonian Model. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2402441. [Google Scholar]
245.
Ouyang J, Cai C, Chen H, Jiang T, Zheng Z. Efficient non-sterilized fermentation of biomass-derived xylose to lactic acid by a thermotolerant Bacillus coagulans NL01. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 168, 2387–2397. [Google Scholar]
246.
Georgieva T, Mikkelsen M, Ahring B. High ethanol tolerance of the thermophilic anaerobic ethanol producer Thermoanaerobacter BG1L1. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2007, 2, 364–377. [Google Scholar]
247.
Wang Q, Guo S, Ali M, Song X, Tang Z, Zhang Z, et al. Thermally enhanced bioremediation: A review of the fundamentals and applications in soil and groundwater remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 433, 128749. [Google Scholar]
248.
He Y, He Y, Abdullah Al-Dhabi N, Gao P, Huang H, Yan B, et al. Effects of exogenous thermophilic bacteria and ripening agent on greenhouse gas emissions, enzyme activity and microbial community during straw composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 407, 131114. [Google Scholar]
249.
Camacho CI, Estévez S, Conde JJ, Feijoo G, Moreira MT. Dark fermentation as an environmentally sustainable WIN-WIN solution for bioenergy production. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 374, 134026. [Google Scholar]
250.
Obruča S, Dvořák P, Sedláček P, Koller M, Sedlář K, Pernicová I, et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesis by halophiles and thermophiles: Towards sustainable production of microbial bioplastics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 58, 107906. [Google Scholar]
251.
Wittner N, Vasilakou K, Broos W, Vlaeminck SE, Nimmegeers P, Cornet I. Investigating the Technical and Economic Potential of Solid-State Fungal Pretreatment at Nonsterile Conditions for Sugar Production from Poplar Wood.  Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 18292–18302. [Google Scholar]
252.
Wu P, Guo Y, Golly MK, Ma H, He R, Luo S, et al. Feasibility study on direct fermentation of soybean meal by Bacillus stearothermophilus under non-sterile conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 3291–3298. [Google Scholar]
253.
Ma C, Wang A, Qin J, Li L, Ai X, Jiang T, et al. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella pneumoniae SDM. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
254.
Dhatt S, Nandi M, Chaudhury P. Substrate inhibition versus product feedback inhibition: In the perspective of single molecule enzyme kinetics. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2021, 53, 775–786. [Google Scholar]
255.
Le Y, Sun J. Chapter OneCRISPR/Cas genome editing systems in thermophiles: Current status, associated challenges, and future perspectives. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Gadd GM, Sariaslani S, Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; p. 1–30.
256.
Houghton KM, Carere CR, Stott MB, McDonald IR. Thermophilic methanotrophs: in hot pursuit. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz125. [Google Scholar]
257.
Sugden S, Lazic M, Sauvageau D, Stein Lisa Y. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Responses to Carbon and Nitrogen Sources in Methylomicrobium album BG8. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e00385-21. [Google Scholar]
258.
Johnson SR, Fu X, Viknander S, Goldin C, Monaco S, Zelezniak A, et al. Computational scoring and experimental evaluation of enzymes generated by neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41587-024-02214-2.
259.
Zhou J, Huang M. Navigating the landscape of enzyme design: from molecular simulations to machine learning. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 8202–8239. [Google Scholar]
260.
Gong X, Zhang J, Gan Q, Teng Y, Hou J, Lyu Y, et al. Advancing microbial production through artificial intelligence-aided biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2024, 74, 108399. [Google Scholar]
261.
Li L, Liu X, Bai Y, Yao B, Luo H, Tu T. High-Throughput Screening Techniques for the Selection of Thermostable Enzymes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 3833–3845. [Google Scholar]
262.
Stucki A, Vallapurackal J, Ward TR, Dittrich PS. Droplet Microfluidics and Directed Evolution of Enzymes: An Intertwined Journey. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 24368–24387. [Google Scholar]
263.
Rolf J, Rosenthal K, Lütz S. Application of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis for Faster Biocatalyst Development. Catalysts 2019, 9, 190. [Google Scholar]
264.
Salas-Bruggink DIJ, Martín JS-S, Leiva G, Blamey JM. Extremozymes: Challenges and opportunities on the road to novel enzymes production. Process Biochem. 2024, 143, 323–336. [Google Scholar]
TOP