B, Gd Co-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Arrays for Efficient Degradation of Gaseous Toluene under Visible Light Irradiation

Article Open Access

B, Gd Co-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Arrays for Efficient Degradation of Gaseous Toluene under Visible Light Irradiation

Author Information
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2
Center of Free Electron Laser & High Magnetic Field, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Views:63
Downloads:12
Photocatalysis: Research and Potential 2025, 2 (2), 10010;  https://doi.org/10.70322/prp.2025.10010

Received: 25 January 2025 Accepted: 24 March 2025 Published: 01 April 2025

Creative Commons

© 2025 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

ABSTRACT: Although photocatalytic degradation of VOCs has attracted widespread attention, the efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation performance remains a challenge. This work presents the visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene over B, Gd co-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays prepared via a controllable electrochemistry method. It was found that B and Gd co-doping strategy not only enhances the visible light responsiveness of TiO2 nanotube arrays but also introduces moderate oxygen vacancies on the surface of TiO2, which is beneficial to the formation of free hydroxyl radicals and their attack on toluene molecules. The doping order also affects the photocatalytic performance. The optimized sample achieves an enhanced degradation efficiency for toluene under visible light irradiation and exhibits considerable stability. This work may provide an efficient TiO2-based photocatalyst for the removal of volatile organic compounds for air purification and give an understanding of the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of toluene over co-doping TiO2.
Keywords: TiO2 nanotube array; Photocatalysis; VOCs degradation; Oxygen vacancies; In-suit DRIFTS

1. Introduction

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are widely recognized as hazardous air pollutants due to their high volatility, irritant properties, and toxic nature, posing substantial risks to human health and the environment [1,2,3]. It is desirable to develop sustainable technologies for the remediation of VOCs pollution, such as condensation, membrane separation, adsorption, plasma treatment, and photocatalytic oxidation (POC) [4,5,6]. Among these, photocatalytic technology is expected to be a cheap and feasible way to destroy a broad range of VOCs to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), which utilizes oxide semiconductor materials (TiO2, WO3, ZnO) [7,8,9,10], to harvest solar light at ambient temperature. The photo-generated hole-electron pairs (h+/e) in these materials can directly oxidize the pollutant molecules or produce reactive oxygen species radicals (•OH and •O2). These reactive radicals further participate in the surface-catalyzed reaction, which then causes the oxidation of organic pollutants to CO2 and H2O [11,12,13,14,15]. Up to now, TiO2 has been the most promising photocatalyst for the removal of VOCs due to the fact that TiO2 exhibits relatively high photocatalytic activity, chemical stability, low cost, and environmental friendliness [16,17,18]. Recently, altering the nanostructure and morphology has been proven to be a useful strategy in enhancing the performance of TiO2 materials [19,20]. Since the first reports demonstrated the feasibility of synthesizing ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays with unique electronic properties and large specific surface area, it has attracted significant attention and extensive study [21,22,23]. Our previous work has also presented a TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNA) photocatalyst possessing a high degree of crystallinity, many exposed reactive sites, as well as high charge carriers’ separation efficiency, leading to a highly efficient performance for the photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene [22]. Unfortunately, TiO2 only absorbs UV light (~4% of the solar spectrum) because of its large band gap energy (~3.2 eV). To overcome this limitation, one of the major strategies for inducing visible light response is element doping [12,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. It has been demonstrated that doping TiO2 with rare earth elements can significantly improve the visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance of TiO2. In addition to the visible light response caused by doping, introducing Gadolinium (Gd) has other advantages because Gd possesses a special 4f electronic structure that could act as an efficient electron trap center to facilitate the electron migration to the surface making available free carriers to take part in photocatalysis [23,24,25,26,27]. However, metal doping may suffer from thermal instability, leading to decreased photocatalytic efficiency. In contrast to metal doping, non-metal doping, such as nitrogen or boron incorporation, not only modifies the electronic structure of TiO2 by introducing impurity states within the bandgap or narrowing the bandgap but also exhibits superior thermal stability due to strong covalent bonding between dopants and the TiO2 lattice [28,29,30]. Notably, recent studies highlight synergistic effects can be achieved through co-doping strategies. For instance, co-doping TiO2 with metal-nonmetal pairs (e.g., Sm-N or W-N) combines the advantages of both dopants: metal ions (e.g., Sm3+) enhance charge separation via electron trapping, while non-metal dopants (e.g., N) extend visible light absorption and stabilize the lattice against thermal degradation [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Such findings strongly encourage the adoption of metal-nonmetal co-doping strategies to optimize both stability and efficiency in advanced photocatalysts simultaneously. Although TiO2 nanotubes have many advantages mentioned above, there are few reports on co-doping based on TNA, because TNA is difficult to maintain the regular and crystalline structural characteristics of TiO2 after multi-element doping. In this work, a structurally stable B, Gd doped TiO2 nanotube arrays photocatalyst was prepared via a controllable electrochemistry method. The doping order and concentration were optimized to achieve a considerable photocatalytic performance for the degradation of gaseous toluene under visible light irradiation. Based on physicochemical characterization, the doping sites of B and Gd in TNA and the effects of the doping sequence were analyzed. The results indicate that the sequential doping of B followed by Gd is beneficial to the formation of stable structure and the rapid separation of photogenerated carriers, leading to optimal photocatalytic performance. Additionally, combined with in-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) results, the mechanism of adsorption and degradation of gaseous toluene over B, Gd doped TiO2 nanotube arrays was proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Materials The chemicals used in the experiments, including titanium (Ti) mesh (99.9%), were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan. NH4F (99.9%) was purchased from Aladdin Ltd., Bolton, UK. Toluene (>99.0%), ethanol (>99.0%), ethylene glycol (>99.0%), and acetone (>99.5%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Deionized water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm) was purified using a Millipore filtration system. 2.2. Preparation of Samples Two-step electrochemical anodization was used to fabricate TiO2 nanotube arrays samples, as the scheme shown in Figure 1. Prior to anodization, the titanium mesh was cleaned sequentially with acetone, ethanol, and distilled water in the ultrasonic bath for 20 min, followed by drying in a desiccator. The anodization experiments were carried out in a conventional two-electrode system with Ti mesh as the anode and Pt foil as the cathode, respectively. Electrolyte solution consisted of 0.3 wt% NH4F in an aqueous ethylene glycol solution with 2 vol% water. In the first-step anodization, the Ti mesh was anodized at 50 V for 1 h, the pretreated Ti would grow on the mesh surface, and then the grown nanotube layer was removed by sonicating in ethanol and deionized water. Whereafter, the second-step anodization was conducted at 50 V for 30 min. The as-obtained TiO2 precursor was thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and deionized water, followed by annealing at 450 °C for 2 h in an oxygen atmosphere (heating step of 5 °C/min) in a tube furnace and allowed to naturally cool to room temperature for forming well-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays. This annealed TiO2 nanotube arrays sample was denoted as TNA. The preparation process of B doped TiO2 (B-TiO2), and Gd doped TiO2 (Gd-TiO2) is shown in Figure S1. To obtain B, Gd co-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays (B/Gd-TNA), the Pt electrode was used as anode. Meanwhile, B-TNA-1 was used as a cathode. The electrolyte was 100 mL aqueous solution of Gd (NO3)3 at the applied current density of 5.5 mA/cm2 for 30 min. Finally, the as-obtained B/Gd-TNA precursor was ultrasonicated with ethanol and deionized water for 15 min. Then, the B/Gd-TNA was obtained by annealing at 450 °C for 2 h in a tube furnace. As for Gd, B co-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays (Gd/B-TNA), Gd-TNA-1 was used as cathode, the Pt electrode was used as anode in the electrolyte was 100 mL aqueous solution of H3BO3 for 30 min, followed by annealing at 450 °C for 2 h to obtain Gd/B-TNA.
Figure 1. Schematic of the sample preparation.
2.3. Characterization of Samples X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a SmartLab 9 kW X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The scanning rate of 0.5° s–1 and the scanning step width of 0.02° were applied in the 2θ range of 20-80°. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out on an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi, Waltham, MA, USA). The binding energy was calibrated by the C 1s peak (284.8 eV). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a Zeiss Supra 40 scanning electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM). UV-Vis spectra of photocatalysts were recorded using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance attachment (SolidSpec-3600, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with BaSO4 serving as the reflectance standard. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and transient photocurrent mapping were conducted by employing a CHI660E instrument featuring a standard three-electrode system. O K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra were conducted at the Photoemission Endstations (beamline BL10B) of the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) in Hefei, China. Ti K-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra were collected at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre (NSRRC) BL16A1 beamline. 2.4. Photocatalytic Activity Tests The performance of the photocatalyst was evaluated in a kettle reactor. The whole evaluation system mainly consists of reactant gas, photocatalytic sealed reaction kettle, xenon lamp, and gas chromatography (GC5190E, Anhui Chromatographic Co., Ltd., Hefei, China). The reaction device is shown in Figure S2. The photocatalyst of 2 × 1 cm size was put into the reactor, and the reactor was purged with air for 30 min after sealing, and the flow rate was controlled at 12 sccm. The initial concentration of 1.0 µL of toluene was injected into the reaction kettle with a micro sampler, and the toluene was completely vaporized by standing in an oven at 80 °C for 30 min. The Cell’s relative humidity level (RH) was fixed at 56% by a bypass with an electronic hygrometer. Take out the reaction kettle from the oven and cool it at room temperature for 30 min. Then the sample was kept in the dark for 30 min to reach the adsorption/desorption equilibrium on the photocatalyst surface. During the reaction, an Xe lamp equipped with a UV cut-off filter (λ > 380 nm) was used to irradiate the photocatalyst. At intervals, the concentration of toluene in the reactor was detected by a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a chromatographic column. The sample was irradiated with a Xe lamp under visible light irradiation for 2 h, and analyzed by chromatography every 30 min. The toluene degradation rate was calculated by the formula:
```latexX_{t o l u e n e} \left(\%\right) = \left(1 - C_{t}/C_{0}\right) \times 100 \%```
where C₀ is the initial concentration of toluene, and Cₜ is the concentration of toluene at reaction time t. 2.5. In-Situ DRIFTS Test Figure S3 illustrates the experimental setup for DRIFTS conducted on a Thermo iS50 FTIR instrument equipped with a custom-made in situ DRIFTS unit. The reaction system is mainly composed of diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy accessories and reaction cells (HVC) provided by Harrick Scientific Company, Pleasantville, NY, USA. This instrument features a semiconductor-cooled mercury−cadmium−telluride (MCT) detector that operates with OMNIC 9.2 software. The recycled condensate water is connected to the bottom of the in-situ cell to ensure rapid cooling of the reaction tank and temperature regulation. IR spectra in the range of 650−4000 cm−1 were generated from 64 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. Before measurement, place the photocatalyst in a high-temperature and high-pressure reaction cell (equipped with a heater) with two ZnSe windows. Then purge with argon for 30 min to remove impurities adsorbed on photocatalyst surfaces. When purging was complete, in order to simulate the real situation in adsorption and photocatalytic reactions, synthetic air of 20% O2 and 80% N2 was introduced into the reaction gas path to carry toluene vapor out of liquid toluene. An equilibrium was established between the adsorption and desorption in the absence of light. The mixture was then switched to air and purged for 10 min to remove physically adsorbed toluene. Subsequently, the Xe lamp is equipped with a UV cut-off filter (λ > 380 nm), and the spectrum is recorded in real-time by OMNIC software on the computer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis XRD patterns of TiO2 and doped TiO2 nanotube arrays samples prepared at different conditions are shown in Figure 2. As illustrated in Figure 2a, the diffraction peaks of TiO2 and doped TiO2 nanotubes at 38.43°, 40.35°, 53.10°, and 62.96° correspond to the (002), (101), (102), and (110) crystal planes of titanium (standard card PDF NO. 44−1294), respectively. The diffraction peaks at 25.49°, 37.95°, 48.21°, 54.09°, 55.16°, and 69.02° correspond to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (116) crystal planes of anatase TiO2, respectively. All the fabricated doped TNA samples show similar diffraction peaks to TiO2. That means the Ti substrate converted to the anatase TiO2 phase after electrochemical anodization. There is no peak related to TiB2, B2O3, or Gd2O3, which shows the purity of the sample. As shown in Figure 2b, the (101) peaks of doped TNA were broader and weaker than the undoped TNA sample. Moreover, the anatase peak of B-TNA’s (101) plane shifted to a lower angle side, indicating that structural rearrangement happened when B was doped into TNA. The results (Figure 2b) reveal that the TiO2 (101) peak progressively shifts to a lower angle with the Gd doping. This blue shift can be attributed to the larger radius of Gd3+ (0.94 Å) compared to Ti4+ (0.68 Å), leading to an expansion of the lattice expansion of TiO2. These findings indicated the successful doping of Gd into the TiO2 lattice. Compared to B-TNA, after Gd was doped into the lattice of B-TNA, the intensity of (101) planes was further decreased, while the intensities of (004) and (220) planes were increased. This might be due to the fact that the (101) plane was sensitive to surface fabrication when doping Gd into B-TNA. Therefore, Gd was successfully doped into B-TNA.
Figure 2. (<b>a</b>) XRD patterns and (<b>b</b>) Partial enlarged XRD patterns of TNA, B-TNA, Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA and Gd/B-TNA.
3.2. SEM and TEM Analysis As shown in Figure 3, the morphological structure of the samples was investigated after anodization treatment in ethylene glycol electrolyte, uniform and compact TiO2 nanotube arrays were successfully grown on the Ti mesh. The structure of the nanotube enhanced the specific surface area, and more reaction sites could be supplied to degrade the toluene. It is clear that uniform and well-aligned nanotubes were observed on the surface morphology of TNA, B/Gd-TNA, and Gd/B-TNA. Although B, Gd doping slightly affected the surface morphology of the nanotubes (Figure 3c,e), it did not damage the structure of the nanotubes. The top view images of the samples reveal that the surface morphology of undoped TNA changed and transformed through structural modification with Gd, B co-doped for TNA. As shown in Figure 3d–f the order of introduction of B and Gd also affects the morphology of TNA. The pore diameter of B/Gd-TNA nanotube arrays increases, and the wall becomes thinner. However, Gd/B-TNA decreases the pore diameter and the wall of the tube, causing agglomeration and damage. Gd/B-TNA causes lattice disorder of TiO2 to a greater extent than B/Gd-TNA, which is also consistent with XRD results.
Figure 3. SEM images of (<b>a</b>) TNA, (<b>c</b>) B/Gd-TNA, (<b>e</b>) Gd/B-TNA, and the magnified areas from the top view of (<b>b</b>) TNA, (<b>d</b>) B/Gd-TNA, (<b>f</b>) Gd/B-TNA.
The microstructures of photocatalysts were examined by TEM. Figure 4a–c shows high-resolution TEM images of doped TNA, the lattice spacing of about 0.33 nm corresponds to the (101) crystal plane of anatase TiO2. B/Gd-TNA and Gd/B-TNA, with the incorporation of B, Gd ions, showed increased fringe spacing compared to undoped TiO2. This may be because the difference between the ionic radius and electronegativity of Gd3+ (0.94 Å) and Ti4+ (0.68 Å) will cause the charge redistribution in the lattice, thus forming different lattice stripes. The presence of B and Gd atoms in B/Gd-TNA was confirmed by EDX mapping analysis (Figure 4d–h). It can further indicate that B and Gd may enter the TiO2 lattice by doping, which slightly increases the stripe spacing.
Figure 4. Crystal microstructure and components. TEM and HR-TEM images for (<b>a</b>) TNA, (<b>b</b>) B/Gd-TNA, and (<b>c</b>) Gd/B-TNA; (<b>d</b>) TEM image of the B/Gd-TNA, and the EDX mapping images of its (<b>e</b>) Ti, (<b>f</b>) O, (<b>g</b>) B, and (<b>h</b>) Gd atmos.
3.3. XPS Analysis XPS method was used to determine the changes in valence states and chemical compositions of doped electrode surfaces. Figure 5 shows Ti 2p and O 1s XPS spectra of TNA, B-TNA, Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA, and Gd/B-TNA. Figure S5a shows the XPS survey scan spectra of the samples, revealing that there are Ti, O, B, and Gd elements in B/Gd-TNA, meaning that B, Gd is successfully doped into TiO2 lattice during electrochemical anodization. As shown in Figure 5a, the Ti 2p XPS spectrum of TNA and doped TNA show two peaks at 458.5 eV and 464.2 eV, corresponding to Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2. the peaks may be assigned to the O-Ti-O bonding in TiO2. As shown in Figure 5b, A broad band of O 1s XPS spectra can be resolved into three peaks, corresponding to lattice oxygen (OL, 529.80 eV), oxygen vacancy (Ov, 531.50 eV), which was the surface absorbed oxygen (533.00 eV) [24,25,26,27,42]. As for the doped Gd-TNA, the formation of oxygen vacancies could be explained by the replacement of Ti4+ by Gd3+. However, previous studies show more oxygen vacancies will become recombination centers and reduce the photocatalytic performance of the catalyst. Therefore, we expect that the introduction of B can improve the defects caused by Gd doping. XPS of O1s spectra for B/Gd-TNA and Gd/B-TNA results show that the oxygen vacancies caused by Gd doping are suppressed by the incorporation of B and Gd. This is owing to the presence of B dopant, which could facilitate the incorporation of Gd3+ into the TiO2 lattice and reduce the concentration of Gd3+ on the surface, thus suppressing the formation of oxygen vacancies. For Gd/B-TNA, introducing the Gd element first will not only inhibit the generation of oxygen vacancies but also greatly reduce the surface-OH groups/oxygen species, which is not conducive to improving the photocatalytic activity of TNA. Figure S5b showed that the Gd 4d peak in Gd doped TNA samples could be fitted into three peaks. The peaks at 144.06 and 141.75 eV were deconvoluted from the Gd 4d5/2 peak, which indicated that Gd3+ in Gd doped TNA samples [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
Figure 5. (<b>a</b>) Ti 2p (<b>b</b>) O 1s XPS spectra of TNA, B-TNA, Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA, and Gd/B-TNA.
To identify the surface oxygen vacancies and bulk oxygen vacancies in the TNA structure, the O K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra were adopted to investigate the electronic structures of all the samples [43]. As shown in Figure S6a, two energy regions can be distinguished. The two relatively sharp features in the region from 530 to 535 eV correspond to the electron transitions from the O 1s orbital to the t2g (Ti 3d + O 2pπ) and eg (Ti 3d + O 2pσ) orbitals [44,45,46]. The higher energy broad features between 535 and 547 eV originate from the transitions to hybridized orbitals involving the antibonding orbitals Ti 4sp and O 2p. Notably, the t2g peak intensity in B/Gd-TNA decreased compared to pristine TNA, directly evidencing surface oxygen vacancy formation through ligand field distortion. Studies have shown that surface oxygen vacancies function as active centers [47,48,49,50], enhancing toluene adsorption capacity through promoting •OH generation via water dissociation kinetics, leading to enhanced photocatalytic performance. Complementary Ti K-edge XANES (Figure S6b) probed bulk coordination environments, where a slight blueshift in the Ti 4d absorption edge indicated limited bulk oxygen vacancy formation resulting from the introduction of doped atoms [43]. Such controlled bulk defect engineering maintains structural integrity while avoiding detrimental carrier recombination. 3.4. Characterization The absorption spectra were recorded in diffuse reflectance mode for the synthesized TNA and doped TNA. As displayed in Figure 6a, it can be noticed that in comparison with that of pure TNA, the doped TNA can shift the absorption edge toward the visible light. To deeply understand the separation ability of photogenerated electrons and holes in photocatalysts, the transient photocurrent and electrochemical impedance were carried out. Figure 6b,c are electrochemical impedance tests and transient photocurrent results, respectively. Generally, the arc with a smaller radius in the EIS Nyquist diagram represents a smaller charge transfer resistance with a higher carrier separation ability. In addition, the higher the photocurrent density is in the transient photocurrent diagram, the faster the separation speed of photogenerated carriers. As can be seen, B/Gd-TNA has the smallest radius (Figure 6b) and the highest photocurrent density (Figure 6c), which indicates that the photogenerated carrier separation ability is the strongest.
Figure 6. (<b>a</b>) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum, (<b>b</b>) EIS Nyquist plots of catalytic agent, (<b>c</b>) Transient photocurrent responses of TNA, B-TNA, Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA, and Gd/B-TNA.
3.5. Photocatalytic Activity The photocatalytic activities of as-synthesized TNA and doped TNA samples for the degradation of gaseous toluene were investigated. Figure S8a shows the photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene on different B-TNA photocatalysts. The photocatalytic performance varied with the amount of B doping. Table S1 shows the doping concentrations corresponding to the sample names. Among all B-TNA, B3-TNA performed the highest photocatalytic activity with a degradation efficiency of 52.2% in 120 min. Figure S8b shows the photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene on different Gd-TNA photocatalysts. The photocatalytic performance varied with the Gd doping amount. Among all Gd-TNA, Gd3-TNA performed the highest photocatalytic activity with a degradation efficiency of 41.8% in 120 min. With the optimum Gd doping amount of Gd3-TNA, the B doping concentration and doping sequence of B and Gd were investigated for photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene under visible light (Figure 7). It can be found that the B3/Gd3-TNA exhibited the highest degradation efficiency of 62.0% in 120 min, even better than Gd3/B3-TNA (44.3%). This suggests that co-doping TiO2 with B and Gd is an effective way to improve its photocatalytic activity. The highest photocatalytic activity of B3/Gd3-TNA on the degradation of toluene under visible-light irradiation could be ascribed to the synergistic effect of B and Gd co-doping can improved visible-light absorption, suppressed recombination of photogenerated carriers, introducing proper oxygen vacancies and increased surface areas. In addition, the order of B and Gd doping also affects the photocatalytic activity of TNA. First-principles calculations combined with experimental verification reveal that the doping sequence fundamentally governs defect configuration and photocatalytic activity. Initial boron doping induces preferential interstitial site occupation (Figure S7), driven by B’s small atomic radius (0.87 Å) and non-valence matching with Ti4+ sites, leading to more surface oxygen vacancies. As shown in Table S2, the B interstitial doping followed by Gd doping achieves minimal formation energy, indicating thermodynamic stability. This sequential doping strategy creates a hierarchical defect architecture: interstitial B generates surface oxygen vacancies, while Gd substitution introduces controlled bulk defects. This spatially resolved defect distribution synergistically enhances toluene adsorption and degradation.
Figure 7. Photocatalytic degradation activity of gaseous toluene (<b>a</b>) B/Gd-TNA, and (<b>b</b>) Gd/B-TNA.
3.6. In-Situ DRIFTS Results The In-situ DRIFTS technique was used to monitor the adsorption, reaction intermediates, and products in real-time. The DRIFTS spectra of toluene degradation at the oxidation reaction stage over B3-TNA, Gd3-TNA, B3/Gd3-TNA, and Gd3/B3-TNA were presented in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. The DRIFTS spectra of other B and Gd concentrations in B/Gd-TNA and Gd/B-TNA were shown in Figure S9 and Figure S10. When samples were exposed to toluene gas, new peaks appeared at about 3075, 3024, 2932, 2881 1604, 1494, and 1037 cm−1. The bands observed at 3075 and 3024 cm−1 corresponded to the νC-H of the aromatic ring, and the bands observed at 2932 and 2881 cm−1 responded to the C-H stretching vibration of the methyl group of toluene. The bands observed at 1494 cm−1 corresponded to the in-plane skeletal vibrations of aromatic rings, and those observed at 1431 and 1408 cm−1 corresponded to asymmetric and symmetric bending vibrations of the methyl group, respectively. A broad band observed at 3400–2600 cm−1 corresponded to the stretching mode of adsorbed water Ti–OH2 species. The bands at 1609, 1605, and 1604 cm−1 corresponded to the typical molecular water bending mode [51,52,53,54,55,56]. The band intensities increased and reached a stable level after 30 min. B3-TNA and Gd3-TNA exhibited stronger absorption at 3400–2600 cm−1 than B3/Gd3-TNA and Gd3/B3-TNA, indicating that B, Gd co-doping led to the desorption of a substantial amount of water weakly bounded on the TiO2 surface. It could be seen that this broadband was recovered after B, Gd co-doped. This result indicated that the surface structure of TiO2 after B and Gd co-doping is the beneficial recovery of hydroxyl groups by the exposure of the hydrogenated samples to air, including water vapor. It could be seen that the adsorption capacity of B3/Gd3-TNA for toluene was higher than that of Gd3/B3-TNA. This might be due to the collapse and damage of the TiO2 nanotube structure caused by doping Gd first compared with doping B first, resulting in decreased adsorption sites.
Figure 8. <i>In-situ</i> DRIFTS spectra for the adsorption of toluene on (<b>a</b>) B<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>b</b>) Gd<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>c</b>) B<sub>3</sub>/Gd<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>d</b>) Gd<sub>3</sub>/B<sub>3</sub>-TNA.
Figure 9 shows the in-situ DRIFTS spectra of photocatalytic toluene oxidation reaction under visible light irradiation. With the increased irradiation time, the IR characteristic peaks of toluene decreased. Meanwhile, some new peaks were in the 1800−1100 cm−1 range. The appearance of peaks at 2869 cm−1 and 2884 cm−1 during the catalytic oxidation of toluene over B3-TNA and B3/Gd3-TNA catalysts can be attributed to the formation of benzaldehyde, as shown in Figure 9a,d. The peaks at 1505, 1502, and 1507cm−1 were attributed to the out-of-plane and in-plane vibrations of the aromatic ring. The peaks at 1164 and 1049 cm−1 were assigned to the alcohol salt species (C-O stretching vibrations). This implies that the C-H bond of the methyl (–CH3) group in the adsorbed toluene was broken to produce benzyl alcohol. The peaks at 1523, 1563, 1453, 1415 and 1455 cm−1 were attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of the carboxylate group, respectively, indicating the formation of carboxylate species. The peaks at 1341,1339 and 1338 cm−1 were the characteristic peaks of the benzoate species. For B3/Gd3-TNA and Gd3/B3-TNA, a new characteristic peak associated with maleic anhydride species appeared at 1252 cm−1.Peaks at 1650−1759 cm−1 are assigned to carbonyl vibrations (νC=O). Peaks at 1500−1600 cm−1 belong to benzaldehyde adsorption. Peaks at 1487, 1456, and 1454cm−1 belong to unpaired methyl bending vibration. Peaks at 1466−1403 cm−1 are assigned to νOH in-plane bending vibrations of benzoic acid.1507−1489 cm−1 skeleton vibration attributed to toluene. Peaks at 1544−1502 cm−1 belong to benzoates [57,58,59,60,61,62]. All these results indicated that toluene adsorbed on B3-TNA, Gd3-TNA, and Gd3/B3-TNA was decomposed by the formation of benzoic acid and benzaldehyde as an intermediate product.
Figure 9. <i>In-situ</i> DRIFTS spectra of (<b>a</b>) B<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>b</b>) Gd<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>c</b>) B<sub>3</sub>/Gd<sub>3</sub>-TNA (<b>d</b>) Gd<sub>3</sub>/B<sub>3</sub>-TNA photocatalysts with visible light irradiation.
The possible degradation mechanism of toluene over the doped TNA catalysts is proposed. According to the above analysis, the fast pre-activation of toluene first occurs on –CH3 through the following reaction route: toluene → benzaldehyde → benzoic acid → benzene over B-TNA, Gd-TNA, Gd/B-TNA. As for B/Gd-TNA, the production of phenol intermediates can be further attacked by the •OH to form anhydride or carbon chain intermediates in the ring-opening process of toluene over B/Gd-TNA. This implies that the B/Gd-TNA interface can more efficiently catalyze the direct opening of the benzene ring. Toluene molecules adsorbed on the surface of the B3/Gd3-TNA catalyst can be oxidized in the following order: toluene → benzyl alcohol → acid anhydride → H2O and CO2. This indicates that TNA was modified by first B, and then Gd provided more oxygen vacancies on the catalyst surface due to the synergistic effect of B and Gd. The oxygen vacancies could be used as adsorption sites or further oxidized to produce active oxygen species to attack toluene. This leads to the B, Gd co-doped TNA having better degradation activity. In-situ DRIFTS spectra results show that the doping order of B and Gd also affects the catalytic performance of the catalyst. The introduction of Gd atoms first results in the reduction of oxygen vacancies and the collapse of the nanotube structure, which leads to the lower photocatalytic degradation performance of Gd/B-TNA.

4. Conclusions

In summary, B, Gd co-doped TiO2 nanotubes were prepared using an electrochemical method with a Ti substrate. The optimized B/Gd-TNA with a stable structure and a suitable number of oxygen vacancies exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity for toluene degradation of 62% after 120 min under visible light irradiation. The structure-activity relationship can be proposed that the co-doping of B and Gd could make TiO2 respond to visible light. Meanwhile, the replacement of Ti4+ by Gd3+ could increase surface oxygen vacancies and trap electrons to promote the separation of photogenerated carriers. In addition, oxygen vacancies can also improve the adsorption capacity of toluene and promote the generation of hydroxyl radicals, which is conducive to the oxidative degradation of toluene.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be found at: https://www.sciepublish.com/article/pii/485, Figure S1: Schematic of the sample preparation of B-TNA and Gd-TNA. Figure S2: Performance evaluation system. Figure S3: In-situ infrared diffuse reflection device diagram. Figure S4: TEM and HR-TEM images for (a) B-TNA, (b) Gd-TNA; (c) TEM image of the B-TNA, and the EDX mapping images of its (d) Ti, (e) O, (f) B atoms; (g) TEM image of the Gd-TNA, and the EDX mapping images of its (h) Ti, (i) O, (j) Gd atoms. Figure S5: (a) XPS survey of the B/Gd-TNA, (b) Gd 4d XPS spectra of Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA, and Gd/B-TNA. Figure S6: (a) O K-edge and (b) Ti K-edge XANES spectra of the TNA, B-TNA, Gd-TNA, B/Gd-TNA, Gd/B-TNA. Figure S7: (a) B-TNA (Bs), (b) B-TNA(Bi), (c) Gd-TNA, (d) B/Gd-TNA (Bs), (e) B/Gd-TNA (Bi), (f) Gd/B-TNA (Bs), and (g) Gd/B-TNA (Bi) models (The blue, grey, green and pink spheres depict the Ti, O, Gd and B atoms respectively). Figure S8: Photocatalytic degradation activity of gaseous toluene (a) B-TNA, and (b) Gd-TNA. Figure S9: Absorption infrared spectra of toluene over (a) B1.5/Gd3-TNA, (b) B6/Gd3-TNA, (c) Gd3/B1.5-TNA, and (d) Gd3/B6-TNA. Figure S10: Spectra of catalytic degradation of toluene with (a) B1.5/Gd3-TNA, (b) B6/Gd3-TNA, (c) Gd3/B1.5-TNA, and (d) Gd3/B6-TNA. Table S1: Doping concentration. Table S2: Formation Energy (Ef) of doped system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D. and S.S.; Methodology, P.W.; Software, J.G. and F.C.; Validation, S.S.A.S. and T.D.; Formal Analysis, X.W. and J.B.; Investigation, Y.X. and L.G.; Resources, Y.W., M.C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.D.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.S.; Funding Acquisition, S.S.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21902001, 22179001 and 22308001), Distinguished Young Research Project of Anhui Higher Education Institution (2022AH020007), Higher Education Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2023AH050114, KJ2021A0029 and KJ2021A0027), The University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (GXXT-2023-009), Anhui Province Engineering Research Center of Critical Electronic Materials, and the High-end Chemicals and Cutting-edge New Materials Technology Innovation Center of Hefei (HCHC202210).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

1.
He C, Cheng J, Zhang X, Douthwaite M, Samuel P, Hao Z. Recent advances in the catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds: A review based on pollutant sorts and sources. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4471–4568. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00408. [Google Scholar]
2.
Ollis D, Pichat P, Serpone N. TiO2 photocatalysis-25 years. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 99, 377–496. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.030. [Google Scholar]
3.
McDonald BC, de Gouw JA, Gilman JB, Jathar SH, Akherati A, Cappa CD, et al. Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions. Science 2018, 359, 760–764. doi:10.1126/science.aaq.0524. [Google Scholar]
4.
Pichat P. A brief survey of the practicality of using photocatalysis to purify the ambient air (indoors or outdoors) or air effluents. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
5.
Shayegan Z, Lee C-S, Fariborz H. TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of volatile organic compounds in gas phase–A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 334, 2408–2439. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.153. [Google Scholar]
6.
Pichat P. Some views about indoor air photocatalytic treatment using TiO2: Conceptualization of humidity effects, active oxygen species, problem of C1–C3 carbonyl pollutants. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 99, 428–434. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.022. [Google Scholar]
7.
Ollis D. Kinetics of photocatalytic, self-cleaning surfaces: A decision tree approach for determination of reaction order. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 249, 431–440. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.079. [Google Scholar]
8.
Guo Q, Zhou C, Ma Z, Yang X. Fundamentals of TiO2 Photocatalysis: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Challenges. Adv. Mater. 2019, 30, 1901997. doi:10.1002/adma.201901997. [Google Scholar]
9.
Jérôme T, Didier F, Pichat P. Photocatalytic Treatment of Air: Comparison of Various TiO2, Coating Methods, and Supports Using Methanol or n-Octane as Test Pollutant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 6229–6236. doi:10.1021/ie900014f. [Google Scholar]
10.
Tee SY, Kong J, Koh JJ, Teng CP, Wang X, Wang X, et al. Structurally and surficially activated TiO2 nanomaterials for photochemical reactions. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 18165–18212. doi:10.1039/d4nr02342k. [Google Scholar]
11.
Pichat P. An overview on the use of adsorption and reactions of NO to probe (photocatalytic) TiO2. Catal. Today 2020, 340, 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.033. [Google Scholar]
12.
Xi Q, Papaefthimiou V, Breton NL, Lenertz M, Takashima M, Keller V, et al. Influence of Nitridation Conditions on the Doping Sites and Photocatalytic Visible Light Activity of Nb, N-Co doped TiO2. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 3705–3716. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03280. [Google Scholar]
13.
Syrine S, Amal B, Brahim B, Lotfi K, Bernabé MS, Anouar H. Comparative Analysis of Anodized TiO2 Nanotubes and Hydrothermally Synthesized TiO2 Nanotubes: Morphological, Structural, and Photoelectrochemical Properties. Materials 2024, 17, 5182. doi:10.3390/ma17215182. [Google Scholar]
14.
Marien CBD, Cottineau T, Robert D, Drogui P. TiO2 nanotube arrays: influence of tube length on the photocatalytic degradation of paraquat. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 194, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
15.
Sun S, Zhang F, Qi Z, Ding J, Bao J, Gao C. Rapid Discovery of a Photocatalyst for Air Purification by High-Throughput Screening. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2535–2539. [Google Scholar]
16.
Zhou X, Liu N, Patrik S. Photocatalysis with TiO2 nanotubes: “colorful” reactivity and designing site-specific photocatalytic centers into TiO2 nanotubes. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 3210–3235. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b03709. [Google Scholar]
17.
Pichat P. Fundamentals of TiO2 Photocatalysis. In Consequences for Some Environmental Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 321–359. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48719-8_10.
18.
Nawaz A, Goudarzi S, Asghari MA, Pichiah S, Selopal GS, Rosei F, et al. Review of hybrid 1D/2D photocatalysts for light-harvesting applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 11323–11352. doi:10.1021/acsanm.1c01014. [Google Scholar]
19.
Li B, Zheng H, Zhou T, Zi B, Lu Q, Li D, et al. Revealing the synergistic effect of bulk and surface co-doped boron on TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Chem. Eng. J 2024, 497, 154726. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.154726. [Google Scholar]
20.
Mollavali M, Falamaki C, Rohani S. Preparation of multiple doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with nitrogen, carbon and nickel with enhanced visible light photoelectrochemical activity via single-step anodization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 12239–12252. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.069. [Google Scholar]
21.
Zhang F, Wang M, Zhu X, Hong B, Wang W, Qi Z, et al. Effect of surface modification with H2S and NH3 on TiO2 for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 170, 215–224. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.045. [Google Scholar]
22.
Cheng Q, Wang A, Song Z, Bao J, Xue J, Li S, et al. Enhancement and stabilization of isolated hydroxyl groups via the construction of coordinatively unsaturated sites on surface and subsurface of hydrogenated TiO2 nanotube arrays for photocatalytic complete mineralization of toluene. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 2213–3437. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105080. [Google Scholar]
23.
Paul S, Chetri P, Choudhury B, Ahmed GA, Choudhury A. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of Gadolinium doped nanocrystalline titania: An experimental and theoretical study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 439, 54–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2014.09.083. [Google Scholar]
24.
Li W, Xie L, Zhou L, Josias O-L, Li C, Xijuan C. A systemic study on Gd, Fe and N co-doped TiO2 nanomaterials for enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Ceram Int. 2020, 46, 24744–24752. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.265. [Google Scholar]
25.
Li R, Yan J, Xu S, Zhou Y, Wang X, Peng H, et al. Preparation of Gd-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays by anodization method and its photocatalytic activity for methyl orange degradation. Catalysts 2020, 10, 298. doi:10.3390/catal10030298. [Google Scholar]
26.
Cheng X, Ma C, Yi X, Xie F, Hu J, Hu B, et al. Structural, morphological, optical and photocatalytic properties of Gd-doped TiO2 films. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 615, 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2016.06.049. [Google Scholar]
27.
Abrar A, Gurbet Y, Rehman Z-u, Paksoy H, Kardaş G. Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting using gadolinium doped titanium dioxide nanorod array photoanodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 2709–2719. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.117. [Google Scholar]
28.
Li Y, Fu R, Gao M, Wang X. B-N co-doped black TiO2 synthesized via magnesiothermic reduction for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 28629–28637. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.121. [Google Scholar]
29.
Cavalcante RP, Dantas RF, Bayarri B, González O, Giménez J, Esplugas S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of B-doped TiO2 and their performance for the degradation of metoprolol. Catal. Today 2015, 252, 27–34. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2014.09.030. [Google Scholar]
30.
Lu N, Quan X, Li J, Chen S, Yu H, Chen G. Fabrication of Boron-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Array Electrode and Investigation of Its Photoelectrochemical Capability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 11836–11842. doi:10.1021/jp071359d. [Google Scholar]
31.
Li M, Li H, Jiang X, Jiang M, Zhan X, Fu G, et al. Gd-induced electronic structure engineering of a NiFe-layered double hydroxide for efficient oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 2999–3006. doi:10.1039/d0ta10740a. [Google Scholar]
32.
Lu D, Fang P, Ding J, Yang M, Cao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Two-dimensional TiO2-based nanosheets co-modified by surface-enriched carbon dots and Gd2O3 nanoparticles for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 185–201. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.022. [Google Scholar]
33.
Mandari KK, Police AKR, Do JY, Kang M, Byon M. Rare earth metal Gd influenced defect sites in N doped TiO2: Defect mediated improved charge transfer for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 2073–2082. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.050. [Google Scholar]
34.
Peng F, Li G, Gao H, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Zhang J, et al. Synergistic Effects of Sm and C Co-Doped Mixed Phase Crystalline TiO2 for Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Materials 2017, 10, 209. doi:10.3390/ma10020209. [Google Scholar]
35.
Wei H, Wu Y, Lun N, Zhao F. Preparation and photocatalysis of TiO2 nanoparticles co-doped with nitrogen and lanthanum. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 1305–1308. doi:10.1023/b:jmsc.0000013889.63705.f3. [Google Scholar]
36.
Cai J, Zhou M, Xu X, Du X. Stable boron and cobalt co-doped TiO2 nanotubes anode for efficient degradation of organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122723. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122723. [Google Scholar]
37.
Huang D, Liao S, Zhou W, Quan S, Liu L, He Z, et al. Synthesis of samarium- and nitrogen-co-doped TiO2 by modified hydrothermal method and its photocatalytic performance for the degradation of 4-chlorophenol. J. Phys. Chem. Solid 2009, 70, 853–859. doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.04.005. [Google Scholar]
38.
Bloh JZ, Folli A, Macphee DE. Adjusting nitrogen doping level in titanium dioxide by codoping with tungsten: Properties and band structure of the resulting materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21281–21292. doi:10.1021/jp507264g. [Google Scholar]
39.
Gao P, Wu J, Liu Q, Zhou W. First-principles study on anatase TiO2 codoped with nitrogen and praseodymium. Chin. Phys. B 2010, 19, 087103. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/8/087103. [Google Scholar]
40.
Quan F, Hu Y, Zhang X, Wei C. Simple preparation of Mn-N-codoped photocatalyst and the enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 320, 120–127. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.089. [Google Scholar]
41.
Zhu W, Xiao M, Hu X, Yang J, Yin J, Yu Z, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of Sn/N co-doping TiO2 on As (III) under visible light. Colloid Surf. A 2023, 673, 131804. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131804. [Google Scholar]
42.
Wang Y, Huang L, Zhang T, Wang Y, Yuan S. Visible-Light-Induced photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous ammonia on Mo, C-codoped TiO2: Synthesis, performance and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 482, 148811. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.148811. [Google Scholar]
43.
Xue J, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Xie W, Zhou J, et al. Nature of Conduction Band Tailing in Hydrogenated Titanium Dioxide for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1993. doi:10.1002/cctc.201600237. [Google Scholar]
44.
Zhou J, Fang H, Maley J, Murphy M, Peter Ko J, Cutler J, et al. Electronic structure of TiO2 nanotube arrays from X-ray absorption near edge structure studies. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6804–6809. doi:10.1039/B909225K. [Google Scholar]
45.
Kaspar T, Ney A, Mangham A, Heald A, Joly Y, Ney V, et al. Structure of epitaxial (Fe, N) codoped rutile TiO2 thin films by X-ray absorption. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 035322. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.035322. [Google Scholar]
46.
Phromma S, Wutikhun T, Kasamechonchung P, Sattayaporn S, Eksangsri T, Sapcharoenkun C. Effects of Ag modified TiO2 on local structure investigated by XAFS and photocatalytic activity under visible light. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 148, 111668. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111668. [Google Scholar]
47.
Su Z, Li X, Si W, Artiglia L, Peng Y, Chen J, et al. Probing the Actual Role and Activity of Oxygen Vacancies in Toluene Catalytic Oxidation: Evidence from In Situ XPS/NEXAFS and DFT + U Calculation. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 3444–3455. doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c00333. [Google Scholar]
48.
Qiu C, Odarchenko Y, Meng Q, Xu S, Lezcano-Gonzalez I, Olalde-Velasco P, et al. Resolving the Effect of Oxygen Vacancies on Co Nanostructures Using Soft XAS/X-PEEM Beale. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 9125–9134. [Google Scholar]
49.
Bhattacharyya K, Modak B, Nayak C, Nair R, Bhattacharyya D, Jha S, et al. The formation and effect of O-vacancies in doped TiO2. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8559–8571. doi:10.1039/D0NJ01017K. [Google Scholar]
50.
Song X, Li W, Liu X, Wu Y, He D, Ke Z, et al. Oxygen vacancies enable the visible light photoactivity of chromium-implanted TiO2 nanowires. J. Energ. Chem. 2021, 55, 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.013. [Google Scholar]
51.
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Liu Y, Wu Z. Fluorine-induced oxygen vacancies on TiO2 nanosheets for photocatalytic indoor VOCs degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 316, 121610. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121610. [Google Scholar]
52.
Qian Z, Guo Y, Luo M, Yang L, Liu S, Qin P, et al. Unveiling the activity difference cause and ring-opening reaction routes of typical radicals induced degradation of toluene. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 471, 134273. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134273. [Google Scholar]
53.
Yang X, Ma X, Yu X, Ge M. Exploration of strong metal-support interaction in zirconia supported catalysts for toluene oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118355. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118355. [Google Scholar]
54.
Sun S, Ding J, Bao J, Gao C, Qi Z, Li C. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Gaseous Formaldehyde on TiO2: An In Situ DRIFTS Study. Catal. Lett. 2010, 137, 239–246. [Google Scholar]
55.
Wang M, Zhang F, Zhu X, Qi Z, Hong B, Ding J, et al. DRIFTS Evidence for Facet-Dependent Adsorption of Gaseous Toluene on TiO2 with Relative Photocatalytic Properties. Langmuir 2015, 31, 1730–1736. [Google Scholar]
56.
Zhou W, Chen F, Li M, Cheng Q, Deng J, Wang P, et al. Facet-Dependent Photocatalytic Behavior of Rutile TiO2 for the Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds: In Situ Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory Investigations. Langmuir 2024, 40, 2120–2129. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03015. [Google Scholar]
57.
Li M, Cheng Q, Shen C, Hong B, Jiang Y, Wei Y, et al. Piezoelectric built-in electric field advancing TiO2 for highly efficient photocatalytic air purification. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 22410–22415. doi:10.1039/d2ra03751c. [Google Scholar]
58.
Zhao L, Zhang Z, Li Y, Leng X, Zhang T, Yuan F, et al. Synthesis of CeaMnOx hollow microsphere with hierarchical structure and its excellent catalytic performance for toluene combustion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 502–512. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.005. [Google Scholar]
59.
Chen R, Li J, Sheng J, Cui W, Dong X, Chen P, et al. Unveiling the unconventional roles of methyl number on the ring-opening barrier in photocatalytic decomposition of benzene, toluene and o-xylene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 278, 119318. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119318. [Google Scholar]
60.
Shi H, Yang P, Huang L, Wu Y, Yu D, Wu H, et al. Single-atom Pt-CeO2/Co3O4 catalyst with ultra-low Pt loading and high performance for toluene removal. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 641, 972–980. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.086. [Google Scholar]
61.
Chen Z, Peng Y, Chen J, Wang C, Yin H, Wang H, et al. Performance and Mechanism of Photocatalytic Toluene Degradation and Catalyst Regeneration by Thermal/UV Treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 14465–14473. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06048. [Google Scholar]
62.
Wang H, Dong X, Cui W, Li J, Sun Y, Zhou Y, et al. High-surface energy enables efficient and stable photocatalytic toluene degradation via the suppression of intermediate byproducts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2952–2959. doi:10.1039/c9cy00308h. [Google Scholar]
TOP